Price per second, 720p and 1080p: Vidu Q4, Omni, Wan 3.0, Seedance 2.5
One table of the new video models at 720p and 1080p: fal list rates read Oct 9, 2026 beside what Sume bills (list x 1.25). Vidu Q4 is not in Sume's catalog.

At 720p the list rates run from $0.0665 per second (Vidu Q4 with the promotion) to $0.462 (Seedance 2.5). On Sume, which bills provider list x 1.25, Omni Flash and Wan 3.0 are both $0.125 and Seedance 2.5 is $0.578. At 1080p Omni is the cheapest of the Sume rows at $0.1875 per second.
What are the numbers?
Seedance 2.5's per-second figure is derived: 21,600 tokens per second at 720p x $0.0214 per 1,000. fal's page lists the token rate for 480p and 720p only, so the 1080p list column is blank; Sume's 1080p figure uses $0.0234 from its own pricing code.
| Model | fal 720p | Sume 720p | fal 1080p | Sume 1080p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vidu Q4 image-to-video | $0.0665 / $0.095 | not listed | $0.084 / $0.12 | not listed |
| Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 | $0.10 | $0.1250 | $0.15 | $0.1875 |
| Wan 3.0 | $0.10 | $0.1250 | $0.20 | $0.2500 |
| Seedance 2.5 (16:9) | about $0.462 | $0.5778 | see note | $1.4216 |
Is the cheapest rate the cheapest clip?
Not necessarily. On Sume, Omni runs 3 to 10 seconds, Wan 2 to 30 and Seedance 2.5 4 to 30; check Vidu's own limits separately. A 12-second shot is out of range for Omni in one job. And Omni's audio is bundled in the rate.
What is missing from a per-second table?
- Retakes: the model that needs three takes is three times its rate.
- Inputs: some models take video or audio references, others do not; see the Video Router docs.
- The date: all list numbers here are from 2026-10-09 and Vidu's discount ends November 30.
How would I run the comparison?
Pick one prompt and one reference image, run it on each model at the same resolution, and note the price and the number of takes you needed. A 5-second 720p clip costs $0.62 on Omni or Wan and $2.89 on Seedance 2.5 at Sume prices, so the whole test across the three Sume models is $4.14 per prompt.
Vidu Q4 would add $0.33 at the 720p promo rate for a 5-second clip on fal ($0.0665 x 5), billed by fal rather than Sume.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Qwen Image Max vs Recraft V4 on Sume: $0.09375 vs $0.05, text-only
Qwen Image Max costs $0.09375 per image on Sume and Recraft V4 $0.05, a 1.875x gap. Both only generate from text, and Recraft V4 returns WebP only.
- Replicate FLUX 1.1 Pro vs Sume flux-2-pro: a 250-image refresh
Replicate lists FLUX 1.1 Pro at $0.04 per image. Sume's flux-2-pro is $0.0375. For 250 images that is $10.00 against $9.375; FLUX Schnell is $0.003.
- Replicate Wan 2.1 at $0.09/s vs Sume Wan 3.0 480p: a 6-second clip
Replicate lists Wan 2.1 480p at $0.09 per output second. Sume's Wan 3.0 480p is $0.0625: $0.54 against $0.375 for 6 seconds. Different versions.
- Runway image API: Seedream 5 Lite at $0.04 vs Sume's $0.04375
Runway's API lists seedream5_lite at 4 credits ($0.04) and muse_image at 1. Sume lists Seedream 5 Lite at $0.04375 plus cheaper draft rows. 500-image totals.
Written by Sume