Replicate Wan 2.1 at $0.09/s vs Sume Wan 3.0 480p: a 6-second clip
Replicate lists Wan 2.1 480p at $0.09 per output second. Sume's Wan 3.0 480p is $0.0625: $0.54 against $0.375 for 6 seconds. Different versions.

A 6-second Wan 2.1 clip at 480p on Replicate costs $0.54 (6 x $0.09 per output second), and a 6-second Wan 3.0 clip at 480p on Sume costs $0.375 (6 x $0.0625). These are different model versions, so this is a price comparison for someone choosing a Wan endpoint, not a claim that the outputs match.
The two price lists
Replicate's page lists Wan 2.1 (480p) at $0.09 per second of output video, under models billed by output rather than by hardware time. For private models it bills for setup, idle and active time instead. Sume bills the provider list price times 1.25 per output second.
| Item | Replicate Wan 2.1 480p | Sume wan-3.0 480p |
|---|---|---|
| Per second | $0.09 | $0.0625 |
| 6-second clip | $0.54 | $0.375 |
| 100 clips of 6 s | $54.00 | $37.50 |
| 1,000 clips of 6 s | $540.00 | $375.00 |
| Valid duration | not stated on the pricing page | 2 to 30 seconds |
Why the version matters
Wan 3.0 is the newer generation; Sume's catalog lists it at 480p, 720p and 1080p at $0.0625, $0.125 and $0.25 per second. Replicate's page row I read is 480p only; for 720p see Replicate Wan 2.1 720p vs Sume Wan 3.0 720p.
Choosing
If you need Wan 2.1 specifically, for a fine-tune or an existing pipeline, Sume does not list it and Replicate does. If you only need a cheap 480p text-to-video draft, the Sume row is 30 percent cheaper per second ($0.0625 against $0.09) before considering quality. Run both on the same prompts before moving a pipeline.
Checking your own settings
Replicate's example prices cover specific models, and the page notes that other models are billed by hardware time, so confirm the exact model page for the Wan variant you use before relying on $0.09. On Sume, GET /v1/videos/models returns the live per-SKU price and the supported durations for wan-3.0.
The cost of a failed or discarded clip counts too. If one clip in four is discarded, effective cost per kept 6-second clip is $0.54 / 0.75 = $0.72 on Replicate and $0.375 / 0.75 = $0.50 on Sume.
What I could not confirm
Replicate's pricing page lists Wan 2.1 at 480p only among the video rows I read, and it does not give a duration limit. No other Wan row or version is quoted. All vendor figures were read on 2026-10-09 and are listed in the sources; Sume figures come from its public catalog and docs the same day.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Runway image API: Seedream 5 Lite at $0.04 vs Sume's $0.04375
Runway's API lists seedream5_lite at 4 credits ($0.04) and muse_image at 1. Sume lists Seedream 5 Lite at $0.04375 plus cheaper draft rows. 500-image totals.
- Runway lists Wan 3 and Seedance 2: 10-second price vs Sume
Runway's API sells wan3 at 10 credits a second at 720p and seedance2 at 36. Here is the 10-second price at each resolution next to Sume's list rows.
- Runway API vs Sume: six video models, price ratio per second
Runway bills credits at $0.01. Six of its API models have a Sume id. Sume's price is 0.75x to 1.93x Runway's per second; the table gives each ratio.
- Gemini Omni Flash on Runway is 720p only; Sume sells 360p to 4K
Runway's Omni Flash model outputs 720p at 10 credits a second. Sume offers four resolutions of the same Google model. Which to use for drafts and finals?
Written by Sume