Runway image API: Seedream 5 Lite at $0.04 vs Sume's $0.04375
Runway's API lists seedream5_lite at 4 credits ($0.04) and muse_image at 1. Sume lists Seedream 5 Lite at $0.04375 plus cheaper draft rows. 500-image totals.

Runway's API page lists seedream5_lite at 4 credits per image, $0.04 at $0.01 a credit. Sume lists seedream-5-lite at $0.04375, 9.4 percent higher ($0.00375 per image). For 500 images that is $20.00 against $21.875.
Image rows side by side
Runway's page gives per-image credit rates. Sume's rates are from its price list, which is the provider list times 1.25.
| Row | Runway credits | Runway per image | Sume row | Sume per image |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seedream 5 Lite | 4 | $0.04 | seedream-5-lite | $0.04375 |
| Runway muse_image | 1 | $0.01 | no equivalent | not applicable |
| Runway gen4_image_turbo | 2 | $0.02 | no equivalent | not applicable |
| Runway gen4_image (720p / 1080p) | 5 / 8 | $0.05 / $0.08 | no equivalent | not applicable |
| Cheapest Sume rows | not applicable | not applicable | grok-image, imagen-4-fast | $0.025 each |
| GPT Image 2.5 low (1K) | not applicable | not applicable | gpt-image-2.5 | $0.02475 |
What this means
Runway's own image models are Runway-only, and Sume does not list them. The only same-name row is Seedream 5 Lite. On that row Runway is cheaper by 9.4 percent. If your need is the cheapest possible draft image from Sume, the answer is gpt-image-2.5 on low at $0.02475, with grok-image and imagen-4-fast at $0.025.
- 500 Seedream 5 Lite images: $20.00 on Runway, $21.875 on Sume.
- 500 GPT Image 2.5 low images on Sume: $12.375.
- 500 flux-2-pro images on Sume: $18.75 at $0.0375 each.
Calling the Sume row
Seedream 5 Lite goes through the Images API like any catalog id.
curl -X POST https://api.sume.com/v1/images \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUME_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Idempotency-Key: seedream-5-lite-draft" \
-d '{
"model": "seedream-5-lite",
"prompt": "Minimal poster of a paper boat on calm water",
"aspect_ratio": "3:4",
"n": 4
}'Caveat
A shared name is not proof of shared limits. Runway's page does not list image sizes for seedream5_lite in the part read here, and Sume prices it flat. Compare the output sizes you need before you treat the two prices as equal.
A 2,000-image month
At 2,000 Seedream 5 Lite images a month, Runway is 2,000 x $0.04 = $80.00 and Sume is 2,000 x $0.04375 = $87.50, a gap of $7.50. If the same month is drafts on Sume's GPT Image 2.5 low row, it is 2,000 x $0.02475 = $49.50. That is a different model, so the saving is only real if the draft quality is enough for the job.
Runway's page also lists a credit price per image for gen4_image at two sizes, 5 credits at 720p and 8 at 1080p. Those are Runway-only models and have no Sume row to compare.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Runway lists Wan 3 and Seedance 2: 10-second price vs Sume
Runway's API sells wan3 at 10 credits a second at 720p and seedance2 at 36. Here is the 10-second price at each resolution next to Sume's list rows.
- Runway API vs Sume: six video models, price ratio per second
Runway bills credits at $0.01. Six of its API models have a Sume id. Sume's price is 0.75x to 1.93x Runway's per second; the table gives each ratio.
- Gemini Omni Flash on Runway is 720p only; Sume sells 360p to 4K
Runway's Omni Flash model outputs 720p at 10 credits a second. Sume offers four resolutions of the same Google model. Which to use for drafts and finals?
- Runway Gen-4.5 alternative: a 5-second clip is $0.60, six Sume ids
Runway lists gen4.5 at 12 credits a second ($0.12). Sume does not list it. Six Sume video ids priced for the same 5 seconds, from $0.375 to $2.889.
Written by Sume