Wan 3.0 vs Gemini Omni Flash at 720p: both list $0.10 per second

Wan 3.0 (fal) and Gemini Omni Flash (Google, about $0.10 per second at 720p) share a list price; Sume bills $0.125 per second for either.

4 min readSume
All posts

At 720p, Wan 3.0 and Gemini Omni Flash have the same list price: fal lists Wan 3.0 at $0.10 per second, and Google's pricing page says Gemini Omni Flash "equates to an effective price of approximately $0.10 per second" for 720p. On Sume both bill list x 1.25, so a 5-second 720p clip is $0.625 on either. The decision is limits and inputs, not price.

What differs

Sume's Video Router docs list Wan 3.0 at 2-30 s, 480p/720p/1080p, with text, image plus end frame, and reference inputs and audio. Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 is 3-10 s at 360p, 720p, 1080p or 4K in 16:9 or 9:16, with native synced audio and a video edit mode through video_url. Sume's list rates for Omni are $0.03, $0.10, $0.15 and $0.30 per second at those four resolutions.

Per-second list and Sume x 1.25 (read 2026-10-03)
ModelResolutionList per secondSume per secondClip length range
Wan 3.0720p$0.10 (fal)$0.1252-30 s
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1720pabout $0.10 (Google)$0.1253-10 s
Wan 3.01080p$0.20 (fal)$0.2502-30 s
Gemini Omni Flash 1.11080p$0.15 (Sume rate card)$0.18753-10 s

Choosing

Pick Omni for editing an existing video or for 4K, and Wan for clips over 10 seconds or at 480p. Wan is cheaper at 480p ($0.05 list), while Omni is cheaper at 1080p ($0.15 against $0.20). For Wan numbers by length see the price table; for Omni by duration see clip cost by duration and resolution.

Sources

Related posts

More in Comparisons

All Comparisons posts

Written by Sume