Wan 3.0 failed generations: not charged at Alibaba, refunded on Sume
Alibaba says failed Wan 3.0 generations are not charged. On Sume the cost is reserved at submit, captured on success, and released or refunded on failure.

Alibaba's Wan3.0 launch note states that failed generations are not charged. Sume's rule for the wan-3.0 row works differently on the surface but lands in the same place: the estimated cost is reserved when the job is accepted, captured on successful completion, and released or refunded when the job fails. A job that fails does not keep your money; a job that is still running holds it.
The difference is timing. A balance can look lower than expected while jobs are running, and that is a reservation, not a charge.
Side by side
The vendor page is a pricing note and Sume's page is a billing lifecycle, so the table compares behaviors, not guarantees.
| Question | Alibaba Cloud | Sume |
|---|---|---|
| Is a failed generation billed? | not charged, per the launch note | reservation released or refunded where applicable |
| When is money held? | not described on the page | at submit, once the request is accepted |
| When is it captured? | not described | on successful completion |
| What if the queue is full? | not described | queue_full; the failed admission's reservation is released or refunded |
What to do after a failure
Read the job first. A failed status is terminal and carries a public error, and a refund does not need a request from you. Then decide whether the cause is the input or the model.
- Validation errors such as too many reference files come back as a 400 before any job exists.
- A
failedjob is terminal; read its error from the job record in Jobs and results. - Retry with the same Idempotency-Key only to read the original job; a new attempt needs a new key.
Budget for running jobs
Reservations matter when you queue many clips. At Sume's about $0.125 per second for Wan 3.0 at 720p, a batch of ten 8-second clips holds about $10 while it runs and settles per job as each one finishes. A failed job releases its share without waiting for the others.
import os
import requests
H = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['SUME_API_KEY']}"}
def state(job_id: str) -> str:
r = requests.get(f"https://api.sume.com/v1/jobs/{job_id}/status", headers=H, timeout=30)
r.raise_for_status()
return r.json().get("status", "unknown")
print(state(os.environ["JOB_ID"]))Where the rules live
Sume's rules are in Generation admission, and the per-model limits are on the Video Router page. The vendor statement is in Alibaba Cloud's launch note. The where applicable wording in Sume's docs is worth reading before you rely on a specific edge case.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- Wan 3.0 price steps: 480p to 1080p doubles twice at Alibaba and Sume
Alibaba lists Wan 3.0 at 0.3, 0.6 and 1.2 yuan per second for 480P, 720P and 1080P. Sume's rate card keeps the 1:2:4 ratio in USD: $0.0625, $0.125, $0.25.
- Wan 3.0 Standard vs Prime per second, plus Sume's x1.25
Wan 3.0 Standard costs $0.05, $0.10 or $0.20 per second at 480p, 720p and 1080p; Prime costs more. Sume lists wan-3.0 at 2 to 30 s and bills list x 1.25.
- Wan 3.0 price: Alibaba US Virginia rate vs the Sume per-second bill
Alibaba lists Wan 3.0 at $0.041 to $0.165 per second in US Virginia. Sume bills $0.0625 to $0.25. Both rate cards side by side and what the gap pays for.
- What 10,000 Luma Plus credits buy in audio vs $30 on a Sume wallet
A $30 Luma Plus month is 10,000 credits: 166 hours of Whisper or 476,000 characters of voice. $30 on Sume buys more voice and music, less transcription.
Written by Sume