Veo, Luma, Runway, HappyHorse not on Sume: the listed model per job

Sume's video catalog has no Veo 3.1, Luma Ray3.2, Runway or HappyHorse id, so none of those names is a valid model value on /v1/videos. The current ids are gemini-omni-flash-1.1, seedance-2.5, seedance-2, seedance-2-fast, seedance-2-mini, kling-3, wan-3.0, minimax-h3, minimax-h3-max, grok-imagine-video-1.5 and h3-max-recast. Match by job: Omni for short ads with sound, Wan or Seedance 2.5 for 15 to 30 seconds, Kling 3 for square product shots, Avatar Video for a talking head.

The catalog list is in the Sume video docs, which say Happy Horse 1.1 and Veo 3.1 are not in the v1 catalog; Google's side is its Gemini API pricing page and Runway's is its developer pricing page, all read 2026-10-05.

Job to listed model

Rates are Sume's, list times 1.25. Pick the row by the job, then check the live GET /v1/videos/models before you pin it.

What the vendors list

Google's page lists Veo 3.1 at $0.05 (Lite, 720p), $0.10 (Fast, 720p) and $0.40 (Standard, 720p) a second, and puts Gemini Omni Flash at about $0.10 a second at 720p; that last figure is the same list rate Sume starts from before its 1.25 multiple. Runway's page sets a credit at $0.01 and lists wan3 at 5 to 20 credits a second by resolution, which is $0.05 to $0.20.

Those are the vendors' own numbers for their own endpoints. They are a guide to what a clip costs elsewhere, not a Sume price, and Sume does not resell Veo or Runway.

Moving a brief

Keep the prompt, change the model id and re-check three limits: clip length, aspect ratio and resolution. Omni takes whole seconds from 3 to 10 in 16:9 or 9:16; a brief that needs 1:1 goes to Kling or Wan.