Vidu voice clone $1.50 and audio $0.05 vs Sume avatar and music
Vidu: voice clone $1.50, text-to-audio under 5 s $0.05. Sume: avatar creation $0.95, Music 1.0 $0.125. Not like-for-like; here is how to budget each.
Vidu charges $1.50 to clone a voice and $0.05 for text-to-audio under 5 seconds, going by its pricing page read on 2026-10-05, while Sume charges $0.95 to create a reusable avatar and $0.125 per Music 1.0 generation. None of these pairs is a like-for-like swap: a cloned voice, a reusable avatar, a sound clip and a music track are different products. This post lays the fees side by side so you know which line item to budget when you compare the two platforms.
The fees
Vidu's page lists voice clone at $1.50 per voice and text-to-audio at $0.05 for clips under 5 seconds. On Sume, avatar creation is a flat $0.95 per avatar and Music 1.0 is a flat $0.125 per accepted generation, per the music docs and the pricing page. The table lists them next to what each one produces.
| Service and item | Fee | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Vidu voice clone | $1.50 per voice | A cloned voice for later speech |
| Vidu text-to-audio, under 5 seconds | $0.05 | One short generated sound clip |
| Sume avatar creation | $0.95 per avatar | A reusable avatar for avatar videos |
| Sume Music 1.0 | $0.125 per generation | A generated music track |
Why they do not line up
A voice clone and an avatar are both reusable identities, but one is a voice and the other is a presenter you can put in avatar videos. Sume's avatar videos are then billed per second, from $0.184 at standard quality to $0.55 at max, so the creation fee is a small part of any real use. Vidu's clone is billed once and then used in whatever speech product it supports.
The audio items are different in kind. Vidu's $0.05 buys under 5 seconds of generated audio. Sume's $0.125 buys a Music 1.0 track, which the docs describe as full-length structured songs of up to a few minutes, and the price does not change with prompt length. Per second of audio, the Sume track is far cheaper, and it is a different thing.
What each fee is worth at scale
If you create 20 voices on Vidu, that is $30. If you create 20 avatars on Sume, that is $19. Ten generated tracks on Sume are $1.25, and the same $1.25 buys 25 short Vidu sound clips. The per-generation numbers favour the product that matches the job, so start from the job and work out how many of each item you will need in a month, then multiply. A common mistake is to compare a creation fee on one side with a per-use fee on the other and conclude one platform is several times cheaper.
- Need a branded presenter that appears on screen: Sume avatar creation, $0.95 once.
- Need a custom voice for narration: compare Vidu's $1.50 with the voices available in Sume's TTS, and check that the voice you want exists on each side.
- Need a music bed for a video: Sume Music 1.0 at $0.125.
A one-time versus per-use view
Creation fees look big only when you create many identities. The recurring cost is in use. A 60-second avatar video on Sume at standard quality is $11.04, which is about twelve times the $0.95 creation fee, and at max it is $33. A spoken line of 500 characters on Sume TTS is $0.02375.
So a team that reuses one avatar or one voice across hundreds of videos should barely notice either creation fee, and a team that makes one-off characters for each video should count it as part of every video's cost.
How to use this
Use the fee table to avoid surprises, not to pick a vendor, and keep a running list of the one-time fees you have already paid so that you do not budget them twice. Pick the vendor whose product does the job, then budget the creation fee once and the per-generation cost many times. Prices on both sides can change, so verify both pages on the day you commit: Vidu pricing and Sume pricing.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Wan 3.0's 20 reference assets vs Omni's 10 images and 3 clips
Alibaba lists up to 20 reference assets for Wan 3.0; Sume's Omni row takes 10 images and 3 clips of 3 s. Which to pick for a branded clip, with costs per 10 s.
- Wan 3.0 takes documents as references. What Sume's route accepts
Alibaba lists documents, webpages and text among Wan 3.0's 20 reference assets. Sume's video route takes image, video and audio references. How to bridge it.
- Wan 3.0 instruction-based editing vs Sume's Omni edit: what each takes
Alibaba lists instruction editing for Wan 3.0, but Sume documents edit only on Gemini Omni Flash 1.1. Inputs, limits and price per second side by side.
- Wan 3.0 or MiniMax H3 for a 15-second ad: same 480p price
Wan 3.0 and MiniMax H3 are both $0.0625 a second at 480p on Sume, so a 15-second draft is $0.94 on either. They split on 1080p, ratios and audio.
Written by Sume