Veo 3.1 1080p 8-second clip cost vs Sume per-second rows
What an 8-second 1080p clip costs on Veo 3.1 Standard, Fast and Lite list prices versus five 1080p rows in the Sume video catalog, dated 2026-10-01.

An 8-second 1080p clip costs $3.20 on Veo 3.1 Standard, $0.96 on Fast and $0.64 on Lite at Google's list prices. On Sume the 1080p rows run from $1.12 (Kling 3, audio off) to $2.00 (Wan 3.0) for the same length, so Sume sits between Veo Lite or Fast and Veo Standard.
The numbers, side by side
Google bills Veo per second of output. Sume bills provider list times 1.25 per second, rounded up, so the table multiplies the per-second rate by 8. Veo has no row in the Sume catalog, so this is a price comparison and not a like-for-like quality test.
| Model | USD per second | 8-second clip |
|---|---|---|
| Veo 3.1 Standard (Google list) | $0.40 | $3.20 |
| Veo 3.1 Fast (Google list) | $0.12 | $0.96 |
| Veo 3.1 Lite (Google list) | $0.08 | $0.64 |
| Sume Kling 3, audio off | $0.14 | $1.12 |
| Sume Kling 3, audio on | $0.21 | $1.68 |
| Sume Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 | $0.1875 | $1.50 |
| Sume MiniMax H3 Max | $0.20 | $1.60 |
| Sume Wan 3.0 | $0.25 | $2.00 |
How to read it
Veo Fast and Lite are cheaper than every Sume 1080p row. Veo Standard is the most expensive line in the table. If you want a Veo-class price on Sume, the rows to test first are Kling 3 with audio off and Gemini Omni Flash 1.1.
- Kling 3 audio on adds a native audio track and costs 50 percent more per second than audio off.
- Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 accepts 3 to 10 seconds, so 8 seconds fits; Kling 3 accepts 4 to 15.
- Wan 3.0 accepts 2 to 30 seconds, which matters when one take must be long.
A worked budget
Say you need 40 eight-second 1080p shots for a campaign. At one take per shot, Veo Lite costs $25.60, Veo Fast $38.40 and Veo Standard $128.00. On Sume the same 40 shots cost $44.80 on Kling 3 audio off, $60.00 on Gemini Omni Flash, $64.00 on H3 Max and $80.00 on Wan 3.0.
If half the shots need a second take, add half again. That retake rate moves the total more than the choice between neighbouring rows, so measure your own keeper rate before committing to the most expensive tier.
- Run one shot on two rows and compare before you scale up.
- Keep the prompt and seed notes so a cheaper row can be retried on the same shot.
Limits
The tables show the model amount. A workspace Agent Fee line can be added on top, so treat the job's own usage cost as the truth and check the live catalog before you budget; limits and rows change.
Google prices are the public list for the Gemini API and can change. Duration, resolution and audio support differ by row, so confirm the request window in the catalog before you compare.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Veo 3.1 4K price per second vs Gemini Omni Flash 4K
Veo 3.1 4K costs $0.60 per second on Standard and $0.30 on Fast. Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 on Sume lists 4K at $0.375 per second. Dated 2026-10-01.
- Veo in Google Ads: 3 images, 10 seconds, and the Sume equivalent
Veo in Google Ads takes up to three images and returns videos up to 10 s. Here is the same job on Sume's video router, with its limits, for use outside Google.
- WaveSpeedAI API alternative: what Sume offers instead
WaveSpeedAI sells 1,000+ models behind one API with tiered rate limits. Sume offers a smaller managed catalog with plan-based concurrency. Compared.
- YouTube Studio clips and Shorts tool vs Sume trim and captions
YouTube's clips tool cuts Shorts from your long videos inside Studio. Sume does the same file work by API, with trim, captions and Timeline. When to use which.
Written by Sume