Veo 3.1 4K price per second vs Gemini Omni Flash 4K
Veo 3.1 4K costs $0.60 per second on Standard and $0.30 on Fast. Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 on Sume lists 4K at $0.375 per second. Dated 2026-10-01.

At 4K, Veo 3.1 Standard lists at $0.60 per second and Veo 3.1 Fast at $0.30. Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 on Sume lists 4K at $0.375 per second, so it lands between the two Veo tiers.
4K price table
Sume's rate is Google's provider list of $0.30 per second times 1.25. Clip totals use the 3 to 10 second window of Omni Flash.
| Option | USD per second | 5 s | 8 s | 10 s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veo 3.1 Standard (Google list) | $0.60 | $3.00 | $4.80 | $6.00 |
| Veo 3.1 Fast (Google list) | $0.30 | $1.50 | $2.40 | $3.00 |
| Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 on Sume | $0.375 | $1.875 | $3.00 | $3.75 |
What the gap means
Per second, Omni Flash 4K costs 25 percent more than Veo Fast 4K and 37.5 percent less than Veo Standard 4K. That 25 percent gap is the Sume multiplier on a same-priced provider rate, which is what you pay for one account, one wallet and one job API across vendors.
A cheap way to avoid paying 4K rates for every try: run drafts at 360p or 720p and render only the winner at 4K. On Omni Flash that is $0.0375 or $0.125 per second against $0.375.
- 360p: $0.0375 per second
- 720p: $0.125 per second
- 1080p: $0.1875 per second
- 4K: $0.375 per second
Draft cheap, finish at 4K
A typical flow for a 10-second 4K hero shot: three drafts at 360p cost $0.375 each at $0.0375 per second for 10 seconds, so $1.125 for three. Then one 4K render costs $3.75. The whole shot is $4.875 including drafts.
The same flow on Veo Fast 4K, with every try rendered at 4K, would cost $3.00 per try. Veo Lite lists no 4K price on the page, so it is not a 4K option.
- Lock framing and motion at the draft resolution.
- Change only resolution for the final request so the shot stays recognisable.
- Check that the result still meets your delivery spec before rendering more.
Limits
Omni Flash caps a single request at 10 seconds, so a 4K clip longer than that has to be stitched from several jobs. The tables show the model amount. A workspace Agent Fee line can be added on top, so treat the job's own usage cost as the truth and check the live catalog before you budget; limits and rows change.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Veo in Google Ads: 3 images, 10 seconds, and the Sume equivalent
Veo in Google Ads takes up to three images and returns videos up to 10 s. Here is the same job on Sume's video router, with its limits, for use outside Google.
- WaveSpeedAI API alternative: what Sume offers instead
WaveSpeedAI sells 1,000+ models behind one API with tiered rate limits. Sume offers a smaller managed catalog with plan-based concurrency. Compared.
- YouTube Studio clips and Shorts tool vs Sume trim and captions
YouTube's clips tool cuts Shorts from your long videos inside Studio. Sume does the same file work by API, with trim, captions and Timeline. When to use which.
- Sume vs Argil: AI avatar video and video agents compared
Argil makes AI-avatar and story videos with a chat agent, Director; Sume is a video agent with a multi-model API. Avatars, API, pricing, and limits compared.
Written by Sume