Veo 3.1 Lite $0.05-$0.08 per second vs Wan 3.0 on Sume

Gemini API lists Veo 3.1 Lite at $0.05/s for 720p and $0.08/s for 1080p. Sume does not carry Veo; here is the closest priced alternative at each resolution.

5 min readSume
All posts

The Gemini API pricing page lists veo-3.1-lite-generate-preview at $0.05 per second at 720p and $0.08 per second at 1080p, with 4K not supported. On Sume the cheapest comparable rows are Wan 3.0 at $0.0625 per second for 480p and $0.125 for 720p. Sume does not carry Veo, so this is a price comparison, not a swap.

Veo 3.1 prices per second (read 2026-10-04)

These are Google's list prices as printed on the page.

Veo 3.1 price per second on the Gemini API (read 2026-10-04)
Tier720p1080p4K
Standard$0.40$0.40$0.60
Fast$0.10$0.12$0.30
Lite$0.05$0.08Not supported

Ten seconds, both sides

The Sume rows are the provider list times 1.25, rounded up to the cent per job. Google's rows are the list price times ten, with no margin.

10-second output (read 2026-10-04)
OptionResolutionPrice for 10 s
Veo 3.1 Lite (Google)720p$0.50
Veo 3.1 Lite (Google)1080p$0.80
wan-3.0 (Sume)480p$0.63
wan-3.0 (Sume)720p$1.25
wan-3.0 (Sume)1080p$2.50

Read it honestly

At 720p and 1080p, Veo 3.1 Lite lists below Wan 3.0 on Sume, because Sume adds 25 percent to the provider list. Choose by what you need: Sume gives one bearer-key API, one balance and one job envelope across models. Price alone favours Google's list.

The Sume side of the call

Replace the model id and keep the rest of the shape.

curl -X POST "https://api.sume.com/v1/videos" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SUME_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "wan-3.0",
    "prompt": "A lighthouse in a storm, wide shot",
    "duration": 10,
    "resolution": "720p",
    "aspect_ratio": "16:9"
  }'

Sources

Related posts

More in Pricing

All Pricing posts

Written by Sume