Runway 5 vs 15 parallel generations vs Sume queueing
Runway plans cap parallel generations at 5, 15 and up. Sume accepts extra jobs as queued behind a per-plan processing limit and reports USD cost per job.

Runway's Standard plan allows 5 parallel generations and Pro allows 15, with Pro also adding unlimited 4K upscaling. Sume does not sell parallel slots by credit tier. It accepts valid jobs as queued and runs as many as your plan's processing concurrency allows, and every job reports a USD cost.
Runway's plan numbers
These figures come from the Runway pricing page, read on 2026-10-03. Plan prices shown are the annual-billing monthly rates.
| Plan | Monthly price (annual) | Credits | Parallel generations | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $12 | 625 | 5 | - |
| Pro | $28 | 2,250 | 15 | Unlimited 4K upscaling |
| Max | $76 | 9,500 | - | HDR and ProRes |
How Sume handles concurrency
Sume separates four controls: processing concurrency, queue capacity, submit rate limits and balance. Concurrency is a dispatch limit, not a submit limit. A workspace at its limit still accepts valid jobs into queued while queue capacity remains, and workers move them to processing as slots free up. Concurrency is plan-only; prepaid top-ups do not raise it.
The documented defaults per plan follow. The dashboard Concurrency tab and the generation_limits.concurrency_limit field are the source of truth, so prefer them over this table.
| Plan | Processing concurrency | Default queue capacity | Accepted job capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Pro | 4 | 20 | 24 |
| Startup | 8 | 40 | 48 |
| Scale | 20 | 100 | 120 |
| Enterprise | 20 | 100 | 120 |
What full looks like
When accepted capacity is full, a paid submit fails with 429 queue_full. That is different from 429 rate_limited, which means too many requests in the window. Retry with backoff, honor retry-after when present, and reuse the same Idempotency-Key so a retry returns the original job instead of billing twice.
Cost shows up per job
Video jobs on Sume bill from a workspace USD balance, reserved on submit at provider list price times 1.25. The poll response carries usage.cost, the Sume billable amount. That makes a batch comparable by summing receipts rather than converting credits.
The two models are not interchangeable: a credit plan buys a pool and a parallel cap together, while Sume ties concurrency to the plan and cost to each job. Compare your expected jobs per hour against the processing column, not against the credit count.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- Runway credits to seconds: Gen-4.5 is $0.096 to $0.23 per second
Runway's pricing page lists Gen-4.5 at 60 credits per 5 s and Seedance 2.0 Pro 1080p at 160 per 4 s. Converted to seconds and dollars across three plans.
- Same vendor, two Seedance 2.5 prices: $0.0738/s vs $0.231 at 720p
Two Higgsfield pages list Seedance 2.5 at different rates: $0.0738 a second on one, $0.231 at 720p on another. How to read a vendor-authored price table.
- Is a 9:16 Seedance clip cheaper than 16:9? Pixel math on Sume
On Sume, 9:16, 16:9 and 1:1 Seedance 2.5 clips cost the same at 720p because the token count is identical. 4:3 and 21:9 cost slightly more.
- Seedance 2.5 cost calculator in Python: tokens to dollars
A short Python function prices a Seedance 2.5 clip on Sume from width, height and seconds. It gives $1.612063 for 6 s at 480p and $8.667 for 15 s at 720p.
Written by Sume