Same vendor, two Seedance 2.5 prices: $0.0738/s vs $0.231 at 720p
Two Higgsfield pages list Seedance 2.5 at different rates: $0.0738 a second on one, $0.231 at 720p on another. How to read a vendor-authored price table.

Two pages from the same vendor, Higgsfield, show different Seedance 2.5 prices. The API blog lists Seedance 2.5 at $0.0738 per second, and the video API comparison, described there as verified in September 2026, lists it at $0.231 at 720p. The second figure is about 3.1 times the first, and neither page, as read, explains the gap.
What each page lists
The comparison page is vendor-authored, so treat rival prices on it as unverified. One row can be checked against a primary source: Google's pricing page lists Veo 3.1 Standard at $0.40 per second, and the comparison lists the same figure.
| Model | API blog | Comparison page |
|---|---|---|
| Seedance 2.5 | $0.0738 per second | $0.231 at 720p |
| Veo 3.1 Standard | not listed | $0.40 per second |
| Runway Gen-4.5 | not listed | $0.12 per second |
| Luma Ray 3.2 | not listed | $0.09 per second |
| MiniMax H3 | not listed | $0.08 per second |
Why a gap like this appears
Plausible reasons for a gap include different units, resolutions, audio settings, or a plan-dependent rate, but the pages do not say. Do not pick the lower number for a budget on a guess. Ask the vendor for the rate that applies to your exact request, or run one paid request and read what you were charged.
Normalize before comparing
Units differ across vendors too. The Sume docs show an example catalog row priced per 1,000 video tokens for seedance-2, and the video docs say the billable amount is provider list times 1.25, reported as usage.cost on the poll response. Normalize every quote to cost per finished second before comparing, as in the stored post on normalizing per second and per token.
What the gap costs at scale
Take a 30 second clip. At $0.0738 per second it costs about $2.21. At $0.231 per second it costs about $6.93. For 100 clips that is $221 against $693, a difference of $472 from a number that no page explained.
The arithmetic is the reason to settle the question with one paid request before you commit a budget. A gap of this size would change a vendor choice, and it can sit unnoticed in a spreadsheet because each figure looks reasonable on its own page.
- 30 seconds at $0.0738: about $2.21.
- 30 seconds at $0.231: about $6.93.
- 100 clips: $221 against $693.
- Settle it with one paid pilot request.
A routine for any price table
A short routine keeps comparisons honest. Do it once per vendor, and date the result.
- Find a row you can check against the model owner's own page.
- Write down the resolution, duration, and audio setting for every number.
- Convert tokens, credits, and per-clip prices to dollars per second.
- Run one real request and compare the invoice to the table.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- Veo 3.1 Lite at 720p: eight drafts cost the same as one Standard clip
At Google's listed rates, one 8-second Veo 3.1 Standard clip costs $3.20 and eight Lite 720p clips cost the same. Here is the draft-then-final math.
- Video API billing terms checklist: expiry, refunds, storage
Higgsfield's API post lists pay-as-you-go USD, no charge for failed requests, funds expiring in one year and files kept 7 days. A buyer checklist built on it.
- How Sume pricing works: plans, one wallet, published model rates
Sume plans set access and concurrency. Usage draws from one prepaid wallet at each model's published USD rate, for generation, the Agent, Formats, and the API.
- AI avatar video API pricing: cost per second and per minute
Sume bills AI avatar video per second by quality tier, with separate rates when you send a product image. Per-minute costs for standard, plus, and max.
Written by Sume