Qwen Image Max is text-only on Sume; Qwen Image takes references
Qwen Image Max on Sume rejects reference images. For edits use qwen/qwen-image. The two ids compared: references, n, ratios, and the $0.075 Max list price.

Qwen Image Max on Sume is text-to-image only: it accepts no reference images, so you cannot use it to retouch or restyle an existing photo. For edits with Qwen, send qwen/qwen-image instead, whose catalog row lists reference images and supports up to four images per call.
The two ids sound like one family with a quality tier, which is why a Max request with a product photo attached comes back as an error. This post lays out what each id accepts so you pick the right one before you build a pipeline around it.
What the sources say
The fal page for Qwen Image Max shows one price line, $0.075 per image, and a demo prompt with a koala holding a card that says 'Qwen Image Max is now available on fal'. The page does not make a formal claim about text rendering and does not list image sizes or a prompt limit, so a text-in-image comparison has to come from your own tests.
Sume's catalog describes the same model as text-to-image only and states that image_urls are not accepted. The Image API docs explain what that means in a request: a model whose input_references descriptor is a minimum and maximum of 0 is text-to-image only and rejects references.
| Sume id | Reference images | Images per call (n) | Aspect ratios |
|---|---|---|---|
| qwen/qwen-image-max | none (text-only) | 1 to 4 | 13: 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 4:3, 3:4, 4:5, 5:4, 3:2, 2:3, 21:9, 9:21, 1:2, 2:1 |
| qwen/qwen-image | up to 10 (catalog default for edit-capable rows) | 1 to 4 | the same 13 |
Try it before you build on it
The check below sends a reference image to the Max id. The docs say a parameter the model does not list is rejected with a 400, so you should see an error status and no generation. That is also a useful pattern for any model you have not used: read the descriptors from the catalog, then send a probe request, before you wire a batch job to it.
The example uses a placeholder image URL. The rejection should happen on the model's capabilities, but the real URL rules still apply when you move on to a model that accepts references: public HTTPS only, with localhost, private-network and non-HTTPS URLs refused before submission.
import os
import requests
H = {"Authorization": "Bearer " + os.environ["SUME_API_KEY"]}
body = {
"model": "qwen/qwen-image-max",
"prompt": "Same mug, new logo",
"input_references": [
{"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": "https://example.com/mug.png"}}
],
}
r = requests.post("https://api.sume.com/v1/images", headers=H, json=body, timeout=60)
print(r.status_code) # text-only model: expect a 400, not a generationChoosing between them
Use Max when you start from words and want the model to compose the whole frame, for instance a backdrop plate you will composite your product onto. Use qwen/qwen-image when you start from a photo and want a controlled change. If you need the exact characters of a headline, generate a few candidates with n up to 4 and check them by eye; do not assume either id will spell a long line correctly.
Prices differ and I am only quoting the vendor figure for Max. For the amount Sume charges for either id, read the pricing line on its endpoint record at GET /v1/images/models/{model_id}/endpoints; the docs say that line is already the amount charged to your wallet.
Before you commit, read both rows from GET /v1/images/models and keep the output in your repo. A descriptor change is the earliest signal that a model has gained or lost a capability, and it is cheaper to notice in a diff than in a failed batch.
Sources
Related posts
More in Models
- Read the Seedance 2.0 catalog row on Sume, field by field
The sample row from GET /v1/videos/models explained: durations, ratios, frame and reference types, audio, seed, pricing_skus and the empty passthrough list.
- Recraft V4 at $0.04 an image: what fal's page does not say
fal's Recraft V4 page gives $0.04 per image and WebP output but no size list. What to confirm in Sume's catalog before you rely on either.
- Recraft V4.1 Utility vs standard: which line for product mockups
Recraft's docs split V4.1 into standard and Utility lines, both $0.035. When flat, front-facing output helps, and what Sume's catalog lists today.
- Recraft V4 packaging concept art: text-only, WebP on Sume
Use Recraft V4 to explore packaging looks before a shoot: vendor price and design claims, plus Sume's text-only, WebP-only catalog entry.
Written by Sume