BHuman 1 credit per personalized video vs a Sume per-recipient clip
BHuman lists 1 shared credit per personalized video, so Growth works out to $0.39 each. A Sume 10-second Plus clip per recipient costs $2.45; Standard is $1.84.
The short answer
BHuman's pricing page states that one personalized video uses one shared credit, which puts its Growth plan ($39 for 100 credits) at $0.39 per video. A Sume avatar clip generated per recipient is a fresh render priced by the second: 10 seconds is $1.84 on Standard or $2.45 on Plus. They solve different problems, so decide which one you are buying before comparing the numbers. Source: BHuman pricing (read 2026-10-04).
What BHuman prints
The page lists Free at $0 with 15 credits, Growth at $39 with 100, Scale at $99 with 300 and Ultimate at $150 with 500. It also states that 1 Speakeasy minute equals 15 shared credits, and API access is listed on Ultimate.
| Plan | Price | Credits | Cost per personalized video |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 15 | $0 |
| Growth | $39 | 100 | $0.39 |
| Scale | $99 | 300 | $0.33 |
| Ultimate | $150 | 500 | $0.30 |
What a per-recipient clip costs on Sume
Per-recipient clips on Sume are separate talking-video jobs, one per script. A mail-merge style batch is therefore a loop of requests, each with its own script text for that person. Costs add up with seconds, so keep recipient clips short:
| Clip length | Standard | Plus | For 100 recipients on Plus |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 seconds | $0.736 | $0.98 | $98.00 |
| 10 seconds | $1.84 | $2.45 | $245.00 |
| 15 seconds | $2.76 | $3.675 | $367.50 |
The Speakeasy minute
BHuman also lists 1 Speakeasy minute as 15 shared credits. On Growth, 100 credits is 6.67 Speakeasy minutes, which is $39 / 6.67 = $5.85 a minute. A rendered minute on Sume is $11.04 on Standard, so the live-style minute looks cheaper on paper, but the two are different products and you should compare finished clips of the length you ship. For 100 recipients with a 4-second Standard greeting, Sume totals 100 x $0.736 = $73.60.
Where the difference comes from
If a vendor reuses one base recording and swaps a name, the unit cost can be a fraction of a full render. Sume does not publish a name-swap mode in its avatar docs I read, so each recipient is a new render and the cost scales with length. That makes Sume the better fit when the whole script differs per person, and a shared-credit plan the better fit when only a few words change.
Whichever you pick, set a spend cap before looping. Submit with an Idempotency-Key so a retry does not bill twice, and read the limits by plan to size the queue.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Canva design generation job v2 vs a Sume timeline plan for a brief
Canva's Sep 29 preview creates a design or presentation from a text brief. Sume's timeline plan checks a clip video for free but writes no brief.
- Canva export limits: 750 per 5 minutes vs Sume's generation queue
Canva design exports cap an app at 750 per 5 minutes and a user at 500 per day. Sume queues instead: max(3, concurrency x 5) jobs, then 429 queue_full.
- Canva image generation job API: AI credits and limits vs Sume
Canva's Oct 1 preview image job spends the user's AI credits and allows 20 requests a minute. Here is how that compares with a Sume image job.
- Captions.ai Max $24.99 for 500 credits vs Sume per-job prices
Captions.ai Max is $24.99 for 500 credits, about $0.05 a credit; its pricing page lists no per-feature credit costs. Sume prices every job in dollars.
Written by Sume