Wan 3.0 720p plus Video Upscale vs native 1080p: 8, 12, 30 seconds
Wan 3.0 at 720p plus Sume Video Upscale at $0.009/s costs 53.6% of native 1080p at 12 s: $1.608 vs $3.00. The table covers 8, 12 and 30 seconds.

Generating a 12-second Wan 3.0 clip at 720p and running it through Sume Video Upscale costs 12 x $0.125 + 12 x $0.009 = $1.608, against 12 x $0.25 = $3.00 for the same clip generated at 1080p. The upscale route is 53.6 percent of the native price. Whether the two outputs are interchangeable for your delivery is something to check by eye on your own footage; the arithmetic alone cannot say.
The numbers
Wan 3.0 is $0.125 per second at 720p and $0.25 at 1080p. Video Upscale is $0.009 per input second, with a 30-second input maximum (a $0.27 job).
| Length | Wan 720p | Upscale | 720p + upscale | Native 1080p | Saving |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 s | $1.0000 | $0.072 | $1.0720 | $2.0000 | $0.9280 |
| 12 s | $1.5000 | $0.108 | $1.6080 | $3.0000 | $1.3920 |
| 30 s | $3.7500 | $0.270 | $4.0200 | $7.5000 | $3.4800 |
Two cautions
First, the upscale is a second job. It reserves its own amount at submit (omit duration_seconds and it reserves 5 seconds, $0.045 rounded up to 5 cents), so budget both reservations. Second, the upscale only re-renders the pixels that exist; a native 1080p generation can add detail the 720p never had. Take one clip each way before you commit a batch.
The saving also grows with length: $0.928 at 8 s, $1.392 at 12 s and $3.48 at 30 s. For a 200-clip batch of 12-second clips, 200 x 1.392 = $278.40 stays in the wallet.
With retakes
Retakes change the comparison. At a 40 percent keeper rate, a 12-second Wan clip needs 2.5 takes per keeper. Native 1080p costs 2.5 x $3.00 = $7.50 per keeper. Generating at 720p and upscaling only the keeper costs 2.5 x $1.50 + $0.108 = $3.858. The saving is $3.642 per keeper, or $87.41 for 24 keepers.
The upscale line is small because it is only paid once per kept clip. That is the strongest argument for the two-step route: you do the exploring at the cheap resolution and pay for pixels only on winners. The weakest case is a clip that was good at 1080p because the model drew fine detail natively, and you will not know until you compare.
Keep both versions of one test clip in your project and decide by looking, not by price.
When to just generate at 1080p
If you are going to retake, retake at 720p, then upscale only the winners. If the shot needs fine texture, hair or text edges, generate at 1080p for those shots alone. See the video models doc for ranges and sizes.
Run the test once
The only way to know whether upscaled 720p meets your bar is to try it on your own footage.
Write the verdict next to the clip ids so the next batch decision is a lookup, not another test.
- Generate one 8-second Wan clip at 720p ($1.00) and one at 1080p ($2.00).
- Upscale the 720p clip ($0.072).
- Compare the three at full size on the screen where the video will be viewed. The test costs $3.072.
Sources
More in Pricing
- Wan 3.0 price per second: 1080p costs 4x the 480p rate
Wan 3.0 is $0.05, $0.10 and $0.20 per second at 480p, 720p and 1080p on fal. Sume bills list x 1.25. Per-clip prices at 5, 15 and 30 seconds.
- Three Wan 480p drafts then one Seedance 2.5 1080p final: $24.13
A 15-second ad drafted three times on Wan 3.0 at 480p ($0.94 each) and finished once on Seedance 2.5 at 1080p ($21.32) costs $24.13 on Sume.
- A weekday 12-second Wan 3.0 ad for 22 working days: $33 or $99
One 12-second 720p Wan 3.0 clip is $1.50 on Sume. Posted every weekday for 22 days that is $33; with three takes per day, $99. Drafts at 480p change it.
- What $10 buys in 720p AI video seconds on Sume, by model
A $10 balance buys about 133 s of MiniMax H3 at 768p or 17 s of Seedance 2.5. Per-second rates from the Sume catalog, read 2026-10-09.
Written by Sume