Veo 3.1 Lite retires October 22: cheapest 8-second clips on Sume
Veo 3.1 Lite lists at $0.05 a second, or $0.40 for 8 seconds, and the preview ends October 22. Sume's lowest rows bill $0.30 to $0.50 for the same length.

Veo 3.1 Lite costs $0.05 per second at 720p on Google's Gemini API, so an 8-second clip is $0.40, but the Lite preview id shuts down on October 22, 2026. The cheapest Sume rows for an 8-second clip bill $0.30 at Omni 360p and $0.50 at the 480p tiers of Wan 3.0 and MiniMax H3.
Lite's limits
Google lists Lite at $0.05 per second at 720p and $0.08 at 1080p, with 4K unavailable, and says audio is included by default. Lite offers no extension, no reference images and no 4K, and its durations are 4, 6 or 8 seconds, with 1080p only at 8 seconds. Because the preview id ends on October 22, a price comparison is useful only for planning the switch.
Eight seconds, line by line
Sume bills list times 1.25 per row and rounds up to cents. List prices below are the fal rates recorded in the Video Router doc; the Google row is Google's own page.
| Option | List per second | Billed per second | 8 seconds billed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veo 3.1 Lite 720p (Google) | $0.05 | $0.05 | $0.40 |
| Omni 360p (Sume) | $0.03 | $0.0375 | $0.30 |
| Wan 3.0 480p (Sume) | $0.05 | $0.0625 | $0.50 |
| MiniMax H3 480p (Sume) | $0.05 | $0.0625 | $0.50 |
| Omni 720p (Sume) | $0.10 | $0.125 | $1.00 |
Compute your own mix
Paste your monthly clip counts into the snippet to see where a lower tier saves real money. It uses the catalog list rates, the 1.25 multiplier, and cent rounding per job.
import math
LIST = {"omni-360p": 0.03, "wan-3.0-480p": 0.05, "minimax-h3-480p": 0.05,
"omni-720p": 0.10}
clips_per_month = 500
seconds = 8
for name, rate in LIST.items():
per_job = math.ceil(round(rate * seconds * 1.25 * 100, 6)) / 100
print(f"{name:16} ${per_job:.2f} per clip ${per_job * clips_per_month:,.2f} per month")
When the cheapest row is the wrong row
A price table is only a starting point. The quickest honest test is to render the same prompt on two rows at the same length, and compare the clips next to the billed amounts in usage.cost.
- If you need a person speaking in sync, check the audio line of the row first.
- If you need 1080p, compare Omni 1080p at $0.15 list per second, not the 360p price.
- If you need reference images, Lite had none, and Omni on Sume takes up to 10.
- If you need 30 seconds in one shot, look at rows with a longer duration range.
Quality is the other column
A 360p clip is a preview, not a deliverable. Use the cheap tier to approve the motion and the prompt, then render the keeper at 720p or higher. The rows differ in features too: the wan-3.0 row notes audio, and minimax-h3 has native stereo audio with 768p as its native size, per the Video Router table. Read capabilities from the live catalog before you commit to one.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- Voice 10,000 product descriptions: $142.50 on paper, $200 per request
3 million characters at $0.0475 per 1,000 is $142.50. Each Sume TTS request rounds up to a whole cent, so batching descriptions changes the bill.
- Wan 3.0 on Alibaba: $0.041256 per second at 480p outside Singapore
Alibaba prices Wan 3.0 480p at $0.041256 per second in Hong Kong and Virginia, and $0.05 in Singapore. Sume bills one global rate of $0.0625.
- Is Wan 3.0 free? The README lists no price; Sume's floor is $0.125
Alibaba's Wan 3.0 README states no free tier or price. On Sume the smallest Wan 3.0 job, 2 seconds at 480p, reserves $0.125 before it runs.
- Wan 3.0 with no resolution sent: priced as 1080p, $1.25 for 5 seconds
Sume's pricing code treats a missing Wan 3.0 resolution as 1080p and a missing duration as 5 seconds. That is $1.25, four times the 480p price.
Written by Sume