Veo 3.1 at Google's list price vs the cheapest Sume row

Google lists Veo 3.1, Veo 3.1 Fast and Veo 3.1 Lite by the second at each resolution. Each row sets one of them against the cheapest Sume model that can make the same clip length and resolution. The Sume rows are not the same model, so this compares price only, not quality.

Worked example: 4-second 1080p clip: Veo 3.1 Fast $0.48 at Google vs Sume

A 4-second 1080p clip on Veo 3.1 Fast costs $0.48 at Google's list price. On Sume, the cheapest row that can make the same clip is Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 at $0.75, which is $0.27 more than Google's list. The Sume rows are not the same model, so this page compares price only, not quality.

The two prices

Google's Gemini API pricing page lists Veo 3.1 Fast at $0.12 per second at 1080p (read 2026-10-09). Sume's Video Router bills provider list price times 1.25 and rounds up to a cent, and reserves the full clip price at submit (read 2026-10-09).

What to take from it

Only models whose Sume duration range includes 4 s are listed. Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 takes 3 to 10 s, Wan 3.0 takes 2 to 30 s, and the others start at 4 or 5 s, so a 4-second request is below the 5-second minimum of the MiniMax rows. MiniMax rows have no 720p tier; the nearest native size is 768p.

A cheaper clip is not a like-for-like swap. Run the same prompt on two rows before you commit a batch; a failed job is refunded, a finished one is captured at the reserved price.

Check your own number

The catalog is public. The per-clip price for your exact model, resolution and length is on GET /v1/videos/models, and the reservation rule is in the Video Router docs.

Every Veo model and clip in one table

This page replaces 18 posts that asked the same question with different numbers. Each row is one of them, with the answer it gave when it was published.