Wan 3.0 cost for sets of short ad clips on Sume, vs Omni Flash

Wan 3.0 on Sume bills by the second at a rate set by resolution, and every clip up to 30 seconds is one job, so a set of short ad clips costs the per-second rate times the total seconds. Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 is the comparison these posts used at 720p and 1080p.

Worked example: 3 video ads of 15 seconds on Wan 3.0 at 480p: $2.8125

3 video ads of 15 seconds each cost $2.8125 on Sume with Wan 3.0 at 480p. Each ad is $0.9375, and every ad is one job because Wan 3.0 accepts 2 to 30 seconds per request.

The price is computed from Sume's rate card (read 2026-10-06): the provider list price times 1.25. The limits come from the video generation docs.

What does the 3-ad run cost at each resolution?

Same 15 seconds, three resolutions.

What does one request look like?

Send one POST /v1/videos per ad, each with its own Idempotency-Key, so a retry never bills twice.

curl -X POST "https://api.sume.com/v1/videos" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SUME_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "Idempotency-Key: clip-wan-3.0-15s-001" \
  -d '{
    "model": "wan-3.0",
    "prompt": "A product on a desk, slow push-in, natural light",
    "duration": 15,
    "resolution": "480p",
    "aspect_ratio": "9:16"
  }'

What should I plan for?

Add a few spare ads to the budget for retakes.

• Check the model id in GET /v1/catalog before a large run.
• Run one ad first and look at it at 480p before you queue the other 2.
• A 402 insufficient_credits response means the balance cannot cover the reserve; nothing was charged.

Every clip set in one table

This page replaces 90 posts that asked the same question with different numbers. Each row is one of them, with the answer it gave when it was published.