Seedance 2.5 leads 2.0 by 27 Elo on text-to-video, not image-to-video
Seedance 2.5 leads 2.0 by 27 Elo on AA text-to-video and 75 on editing, but 2.0 is fifth on image-to-video and 2.5 is not in the top 12. Sume prices both.

Seedance 2.5 is ahead of Seedance 2.0 on two of the three Artificial Analysis video boards: 27 Elo on text-to-video (1,143 against 1,116) and 75 on video editing (1,151 against 1,076). On image-to-video the order flips: Seedance 2.0 at 720p is fifth with 1,176, and Seedance 2.5 does not appear in the top 12 rows I read. On Sume, 2.5 costs $0.5778 per second at 720p against $0.378 for 2.0, about 1.53 times as much.
What the boards say
Board prices are the vendors' list prices per minute, as read.
| Board | Seedance 2.5 | Seedance 2.0 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text-to-video: Elo / price per minute | 1143 / $34.12 | 1116 / $22.45 | 2.5 leads by 27 |
| Video editing: Elo / price per minute | 1151 / $40.82 | 1076 / not read | 2.5 leads by 75 |
| Image-to-video: Elo / price per minute | Not in the top 12 | 1176 / $9.07 (720p) | 2.0 is 5th |
What each costs on Sume
Sume prices Seedance by video tokens: tokens = ceil(width x height x seconds x 24 / 1024). At 720p (1280 x 720) one second is 21,600 tokens. The 2.5 list rate is $0.0214 per 1,000 tokens and the 2.0 rate is $0.014, each x 1.25.
| Model | Tokens per second | List per second | Sume per second | 5 s clip | Sume per minute |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| seedance-2.5 | 21,600 | $0.462 | $0.5778 | $2.889 | $34.67 |
| seedance-2 | 21,600 | $0.302 | $0.378 | $1.89 | $22.68 |
Reading the split
For a prompt-only brief, 27 Elo is a 53.9% win chance on the usual Elo scale, and it comes with a 53% price premium. The extra length is the stronger reason to pay: Seedance 2.5 accepts 4 to 30 seconds, and 2.0 accepts 4 to 15.
For animating a still, the board says 2.0 is the one to try first. It is cheaper by $1.00 on a 5 second clip ($2.889 less $1.89) and ranks well above 2.5 on that task. Check that claim with your own frames; the board does not say why the order flips.
- Need more than 15 seconds in one job: Seedance 2.5 or Wan 3.0.
- Need a still to move for 5 seconds: try Seedance 2.0 first.
- Need a text-to-video clip and the cheapest board leader: see Wan 3.0 at $7.50 a minute.
Where to go next
The 2.5 or 2.0 decision page lists the four questions that pick between them, and the board-to-Sume list shows the rest of the top 12.
Cost of a split workflow
Because the order flips by task, a split workflow is worth costing. Animate stills on Seedance 2.0 at 720p ($1.89 for 5 seconds) and write prompt-only clips on Seedance 2.5 ($2.889 for 5 seconds). Ten of each cost 10 x $1.89 + 10 x $2.889 = $47.79.
Compare with running all twenty on 2.5: 20 x $2.889 = $57.78. The split saves $9.99 on twenty clips. The saving is small, so only split if the image-to-video clips from 2.0 look at least as good to you.
Check duration before price. A 20 second shot cannot run on Seedance 2.0, whose maximum is 15 seconds, so the question is closed before the Elo is read. For a 12 second clip both models are open, and 2.0 is cheaper by 12 x ($0.5778 - $0.378) = $2.40 at 720p.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Seedance 2.5 or 2.0 for a 15 s clip: $8.67 vs $5.67 at 720p
For the same 15 seconds, Seedance 2.5 costs 53% more than Seedance 2.0 at 720p ($8.67 vs $5.67). Where 2.5 earns it and where 2.0 is enough.
- Seedance 2.5 vs 2.0 for an 8 s vertical ad: $4.63 vs $3.03 at 720p
Seedance 2.5 costs 53% more than 2.0 for an 8 s 720p 9:16 clip ($4.63 vs $3.03), but runs to 30 s instead of 15 s. Price and range at 480p, 720p and 1080p.
- Seedance 2.5 vs Seedance 2: the price gap at 480p, 720p and 1080p
Seedance 2.5 costs 1.53x Seedance 2 at 720p and 1.67x at 1080p on Sume. Per-clip prices for 6, 10 and 15 s, and what 2.5 adds.
- Seedance 2 Fast vs Seedance 2 Mini on Sume: limits and price
Seedance 2 Fast and Mini share a 4 to 15 second range on Sume. Fast costs 60 percent more per second. Price grid for six common clips, plus per-second rates.
Written by Sume