Runway GWM Worlds 2 is real-time 720p; Sume video jobs are async
Runway's GWM Worlds 2 (Sept 3) streams steerable 720p 24 fps video in real time. Sume video is submit-and-poll jobs; here is when each fits.

Runway's GWM Worlds 2, listed on its research page with a date of September 3, 2026, is a research preview that generates continuous 720p video at 24 frames per second with 48,000 Hz audio, steered live by text actions. Sume does not offer anything like it. Every Sume video model is an asynchronous job: you submit a request, get a job id, and poll or take a webhook until the finished file is ready. If you need a world you can walk through in real time, Sume is the wrong tool. If you need a finished clip, Sume's rows are the right shape.
Two different products
Runway's page describes GWM Worlds 2 as a way to define a world, with its environment, subjects, visual style, physical rules and ambience, and then steer it with free-form text actions. The page we read gives no API availability for it. Nearby on the same page, Solaris (September 1, 2026) is described as an interface world model that generates interactive UI without traditional code.
Sume's video guide describes the opposite pattern: submit to POST /v1/videos, receive a job id and polling URL at once, poll until completed, then download the file. Video generation there usually takes from 30 seconds to several minutes, as a function of the model and parameters.
| Question | Runway GWM Worlds 2 | Sume video jobs |
|---|---|---|
| Output | Continuous stream, 720p at 24 fps, 48 kHz audio | A finished file per job |
| Control | Text actions while it runs | One prompt and inputs per job |
| API listed on the page read | Not stated (research preview) | Yes, POST /v1/videos |
| Typical wait | Interactive | 30 seconds to several minutes |
| Completion signal | Not applicable | Polling or signed callback_url |
Approximate a walkthrough on Sume
If what you want is an explorable-feeling sequence rather than true interactivity, you can chain jobs. Generate a first clip, take its last frame as the first_frame of the next, and change the prompt for each step. It is not real time, and each step is a paid job, but it gives you a path the viewer can watch.
Steps:
- Generate the opening shot, for example 5 seconds on Wan 3.0 at 720p, which is $0.63.
- Extract the last frame of the result.
- Submit the next job with that frame as
first_frameand a new action in the prompt. - Repeat for the number of steps you need, then join the clips.
{
"model": "wan-3.0",
"prompt": "The camera turns left into the glass atrium, light shifting",
"resolution": "720p",
"duration": 5,
"frame_images": [
{
"type": "image_url",
"image_url": {"url": "https://example.com/previous-last-frame.png"},
"frame_type": "first_frame"
}
]
}Matching the product to the need
Ask three questions. Does a person need to steer the output while it plays? Does the result need to be a file you can edit, caption and publish? Can the work wait a few minutes? If the answers are yes, no and no, you want a real-time world model. If they are no, yes and yes, you want a job-based video API.
Most marketing and product video falls in the second group, which is why a file-per-job model with a documented price per second is easy to budget. A research preview, by definition, is not something to put under a launch date.
What Sume does not do
Sume does not stream video frames, does not accept live text actions, and does not simulate physical rules over time. Chained clips are separate generations, so continuity of objects is not guaranteed. For agent workflows, hosted MCP gives you jobs_wait to hold on a job rather than poll by hand, but that is still a job, not a live stream.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- One 4:5 poster, four Sume image models: what a round costs
Flux 2 Pro, Seedream 5 Lite, Qwen Image and Recraft V4 all list 4:5. One image from each costs $0.15625 on Sume. The arithmetic and the catch for each row.
- SCORM export for AI avatar video: HeyGen, Colossyan, and Sume
HeyGen Business and Colossyan Professional list SCORM export. Plan prices, export limits and quizzes, and what Sume returns instead: a plain MP4 with no SCORM.
- Seedance 2.5 leads 2.0 by 27 Elo on text-to-video, not image-to-video
Seedance 2.5 leads 2.0 by 27 Elo on AA text-to-video and 75 on editing, but 2.0 is fifth on image-to-video and 2.5 is not in the top 12. Sume prices both.
- Seedance 2.5 or 2.0 for a 15 s clip: $8.67 vs $5.67 at 720p
For the same 15 seconds, Seedance 2.5 costs 53% more than Seedance 2.0 at 720p ($8.67 vs $5.67). Where 2.5 earns it and where 2.0 is enough.
Written by Sume