Price an AI video before you submit: Sume plan calls and catalog
Two free ways to see a Sume price first: the unbilled timeline plan call and the models endpoint with pricing lines. What each returns and what it misses.

Sume lets you read a price before you spend anything, in two places. The timeline plan call prices an edit, and the model catalogs list per-model prices for generation. Neither reserves credits.
Timeline plan: exact for the edit
POST /v1/timeline-1.0/plan compiles the request without creating a job. Per the timeline docs it returns duration_seconds, segment_count, billable_minutes, estimated_cost_usd_micros and a filtergraph summary. It also needs no Idempotency-Key. One limit: the docs say a plan cannot predict short-source pad or loop warnings.
Model catalogs: per-model prices
The video docs point to GET /v1/videos/models for each model's capabilities and prices, and the image docs do the same with GET /v1/images/models, whose pricing lines carry a billable unit and cost_usd. Image lines already include Sume's margin, so a request for n images costs cost_usd times n. For video, the amount held at submit is the provider list price times 1.25.
| What you are pricing | Where to read it | Cost to look |
|---|---|---|
| Timeline render | POST /v1/timeline-1.0/plan | Free |
| A video model | GET /v1/videos/models | Free |
| An image model | GET /v1/images/models | Free |
| Anything else | GET /v1/catalog | Free |
A routine that avoids surprises
- Plan the edit and note
estimated_cost_usd_micros. - Read the per-second price of the generation model and multiply by total seconds.
- Add the flat jobs, such as captions at $0.20.
- Compare the total with
GET /v1/balancebefore you submit.
What the previews cannot tell you
A price read is not a promise about outcome. The plan call cannot predict pad and loop warnings for short sources, and a catalog price is per unit, not per project. Neither tells you how many takes you will need. The reserve at submit can also differ from the final capture: for jobs priced by actual compute, the docs say the capture is never more than the hold.
Use the previews to set an upper bound, then compare the final usage row with it. Over a few projects you will learn your own ratio of estimate to spend.
Catalog numbers can change, which is why the docs keep telling you to read the live endpoint. A blog post is a snapshot dated 2026-10-04.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- Queue 12 holiday clips at once: the wallet balance the holds need
Twelve 15-second 720p Seedance 2.5 clips hold $104.004 at submit on Sume. If the balance is lower, later jobs return 402 insufficient credits.
- Qwen Image 3.0 per-image cost: yuan to dollars
Qwen Image 3.0 is reported at CNY 0.18 Standard or 0.50 Pro per 2K image, plus CNY 0.02 per input image. How to convert, and where Sume prints prices.
- Replace your Sora spend view: log usage.cost per video job
If your Sora spend view is gone, record Sume's usage.cost on every completed video job and total it by feature, account and model in your own table.
- Runway Aleph 2.0 at 140 credits per 5 seconds vs Gen-4.5 at 60
Runway lists Aleph 2.0 at 140 credits per 5 seconds and Gen-4.5 at 60: $1.40 to $3.36 against $0.60 to $1.44 a clip by plan. Aleph costs 2.3 times more.
Written by Sume