IFPI AI chart rules: scoring a music video with AI audio
IFPI's July 30, 2026 chart principles ask for lawful AI services and substantially human-made tracks. What that means for a music video score on Sume.

Can an AI-made song chart? IFPI's announcement (read 2026-10-04) says a recording developed with generative AI qualifies for official charts only if it meets three tests: the AI service used is authorised and lawful, the track is substantially human made, and it raises no stream or chart manipulation concerns. The principles were announced on July 30, 2026 and, per IFPI, apply first to official charts it runs directly across Latin America, the Middle East, Africa and Southeast Asia.
If you make music videos, this matters less for the picture and more for the audio. A video whose only soundtrack is one unedited AI generation is the case the principles are aimed at. A video that carries a human-made song, with AI used somewhere around it, is not. Sume's side is the tooling: generate, cut and lay audio, and caption.
What the three tests ask of a production
Read the principles on IFPI's page and the MBW report. Chart eligibility belongs to the chart body, so nothing Sume returns can certify a track either way.
| IFPI test | What it asks | What a video team can do |
|---|---|---|
| Lawful AI service | The AI service is authorised and lawful | Keep a record of which engine ran, from job.request.routed_model |
| Substantially human made | The track is not purely synthetic | Keep stems, takes and session notes that show the human work |
| No manipulation | No stream or chart manipulation concern | Nothing to configure in a video tool; do not buy streams |
Where Sume helps with the record
The Music Router echoes the requested id in job.model (sume/music-auto stays sume/music-auto) and names the engine that ran in job.request.routed_model, for example lyria-3.5. Saving that field next to each generated cue is a cheap way to answer where a sound came from later.
That is provenance of the generation, not a rights opinion. The docs do not say anything about charts or licensing, and this post does not either.
A production pattern that stays human-led
Use AI for what the principles most plausibly leave room for, the creative process around a human-made song: a scratch bed to cut picture against, a temp score for a pitch, a reference for a composer. Then let the final audio be the human record. In Timeline 1.0 the audio spine and the optional soundtrack bed are separate inputs, so swapping the temp bed for the finished audio is one URL change on the render request.
curl https://api.sume.com/v1/music-router/models \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUME_API_KEY"Short answer for your release plan
If a track might go to charts, ask the distributor and the chart body in writing before you spend on the video. If the audio only lives inside the video, none of this changes your render.
Sources
Related posts
More in Use cases
- In-store screen loop: a 30-second 16:9 clip at 720p vs 1080p on Sume
A 30 s 16:9 Seedance 2.5 clip costs $17.334 at 720p and $42.6465 at 1080p on Sume. Wan 3.0: $3.75 and $7.50.
- Kling 4.0 keyframes at 0, 6, 12, 20, 28 s: a 30-second ad on Sume
Kling's guide suggests keyframes near 0, 6, 12, 20 and 28 seconds for a product ad. How to build the same plan on Sume with first-and-last-frame clips.
- Kling 4.0 lip-sync reaches nine languages: a one-clip test each
Kling 4.0 adds Portuguese, German, French and Hindi lip-sync to five existing languages. A short per-language test plan to run before you promise localization.
- Korea AI Basic Act: 30M won fine and a Korean-ad label
A secondary source says Korea's AI Basic Act grace period runs to Jan 2027 with fines up to KRW 30M. How to burn an authored Korean notice with Sume captions.
Written by Sume