Kling 4.0 lip-sync reaches nine languages: a one-clip test each

Kling 4.0 adds Portuguese, German, French and Hindi lip-sync to five existing languages. A short per-language test plan to run before you promise localization.

4 min readSume
All posts

Kling 4.0 lists nine lip-sync languages: Portuguese, German, French, and Hindi were added to Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean, and Spanish, according to the Kling 4.0 vs 3.0 page. A language on the list tells you it is supported, not that it looks right. Test one short clip per language before you promise a localized campaign.

The nine languages

The same page lists improved lip-sync and two-channel stereo audio for 4.0. Nothing on it quantifies quality, so the test below is the only way to learn how a language performs for your voice, script, and framing.

A test matrix

Use the same shot, the same speaker description, and one sentence of comparable length per language. Differences you see are then about the language, not the setup.

One-clip lip-sync test per language (Kling 4.0 list, read 2026-10-03)
LanguageStatus on Kling's listCheck by eyeCheck by ear
Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean, SpanishExisting languagesMouth shapes on stressed syllablesTiming against the mouth
Portuguese, German, French, HindiAdded in 4.0Mouth shapes on stressed syllablesTiming against the mouth

Keep tests short and cheap

Keep each test to 5 to 8 seconds so a failed take is cheap. Sume reserves the estimated cost when a request is accepted and releases the reservation for failed jobs, per the admission docs, but a completed bad take is still billed. The docs name no Kling 4.0 id yet, so list the live catalog and check generate_audio and supported_durations before you plan around it.

What to score

Scoring keeps a language test from becoming opinion. Use three questions per clip and answer each yes or no: does the mouth open for every stressed syllable, does the speech start and stop with the mouth, and are names and numbers pronounced correctly. A language passes when the answer to all three is yes on both takes.

Add one native speaker to the review if you can. A non-speaker can judge mouth timing, but only a speaker can judge whether the pronunciation sounds natural, and that is often what a local audience notices first.

  • Mouth opens on stressed syllables.
  • Speech starts and stops with the mouth.
  • Names and numbers are correct.
  • A native speaker confirms naturalness.

Record what failed

Write down, per language, what failed: wrong mouth shapes, drift across the clip, or mispronounced names. Brand names and numbers are the usual trouble, so include one in every test sentence. The video docs describe the request fields. If a language fails, plan a fallback route such as a voiceover track laid under a silent clip.

  • Use one sentence with a brand name and a number in every language.
  • Run each language twice to see take-to-take variance.
  • Keep the best clip and the failure notes with the job id.
  • Decide a fallback before launch, not after a client review.

Sources

Related posts

More in Use cases

All Use cases posts

Written by Sume