HeyGen Business: 5 custom avatars and $20 seats vs a Sume API key
HeyGen Business lists $149 a month, 5 custom avatars and $20 per extra seat. Sume is an API with keys and scopes, not seats, so team access works differently.
HeyGen's pricing page lists the Business plan at $149 a month with 1,500 credits, up to 60-minute videos and 5 custom avatars, plus $20 per seat per month for team members. Sume has no seat model in its API docs. Access is a bearer key with scopes, so a team shares capability by creating keys for each service or person, and spend is controlled per run with a cap. That is a different bill shape: seats scale with people, keys scale with systems.
HeyGen source: pricing, read 2026-10-04. Sume sources: Authentication and Calling a Format.
What the HeyGen Business plan lists
The page also lists Free at $0 with 3 videos a month of up to 1 minute and 1 custom avatar, Creator at $29 with 600 credits, Pro at $49 with 1,000 credits, and Enterprise on custom terms. Business adds the seat price for extra team members.
| Plan | Price | Credits | Longest video | Custom avatars |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Not listed | 1 minute | 1 |
| Creator | $29/mo | 600 | 30 minutes | 1+ |
| Pro | $49/mo | 1,000 | 30 minutes | 1+ |
| Business | $149/mo + $20/seat | 1,500 | 60 minutes | 5+ |
How a team uses Sume without seats
There are three levers. Keys: one per service, with only the scopes it needs. Spend caps: generation_spend_cap_usd bounds a Format run. Handles: a ready avatar is referenced by its avatar_handle. The Formats docs note that a service-account key cannot create Format runs, so use a workspace key for those.
- One key per pipeline, rotated on a schedule.
- Cap each run, and give batch jobs their own cap.
- Name avatar handles by brand so people know which to use.
Who should pick which
A marketing team of several people who edit videos by hand in a browser is the HeyGen Business shape: seats, a shared library and an editor. A backend that renders thousands of personalised clips is the Sume shape: no editor seats, an API, and costs that follow the number of renders.
Bottom line
Compare the cost of seats times people against per-render costs times volume, using your real numbers. The two models only look alike on a pricing table.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- Holiday 2026 media budget for 100 SKUs from Sume's prices
A worked budget for 100 SKUs using prices stated in Sume's docs: three Ideogram images, one captioned clip and one stitched video each, plus what to leave out.
- Ideogram 4.5 costs the same at any size; GPT Image 2.5 does not
Ideogram 4.5 lists $0.03, $0.06 or $0.22 per image whatever the size; GPT Image 2.5 output rises with pixels. Which to pick for 1K versus 2K and 4K work.
- Ideogram 4.5 high costs 7x low: when it pays
Ideogram 4.5 lists at $0.03, $0.06 or $0.22 per image by quality, whatever the size. High is about 7x low; here is a plan for when the extra cost is worth it.
- Is the Veo 3.1 API free? The per-second prices Google lists
Veo 3.1 on the Gemini API is priced per second for Standard, Fast and Lite, charged only on success. The rates, plus 8-second clip totals and what to verify.
Written by Sume