Grok Imagine video API: image to video, 4–15 seconds
Grok Imagine Video 1.5 is on Sume's video API as image-to-video only: a first frame and a prompt give a 4–15 second silent clip at 480p or 720p.

Yes, you can call Grok Imagine video over an API. On Sume's video API the model is grok-imagine-video-1.5 (Grok Imagine Video 1.5) on POST /v1/videos, and it runs as image-to-video only: you send a first-frame image and a prompt, and it returns a 4–15 second clip at 480p or 720p, with no audio track. On Sume it does not generate from text alone.
The model limits come from the grok-imagine-video-1.5 catalog entry behind GET /v1/videos/models and the Sume API reference; the request flow comes from the Video generation docs. All were read on 2026-09-28, and "current code" marks behavior read from the API code.
How do I call the Grok Imagine video API?
Put the image in frame_images as the first_frame and describe the motion in prompt. The image must be a public HTTPS URL. The legacy Video Router route takes the same image as image_url, which its reference marks "Required for grok-imagine-video-1.5".
curl -X POST "https://api.sume.com/v1/videos" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUME_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Idempotency-Key: grok-pushin-001" \
-d '{
"model": "grok-imagine-video-1.5",
"prompt": "Subtle camera push-in with natural motion.",
"frame_images": [
{ "type": "image_url", "image_url": { "url": "https://example.com/first-frame.png" }, "frame_type": "first_frame" }
],
"resolution": "720p",
"duration": 6
}'What does grok-imagine-video-1.5 accept?
Fewer fields than most catalog models. In current code, a value the model doesn't list for these fields is refused at submit with 400 unsupported_capability.
| Field | grok-imagine-video-1.5 |
|---|---|
prompt | Required |
| First frame | Required: frame_images with first_frame |
| Last frame | Not supported |
input_references | Not supported |
duration | 4 to 15 whole seconds |
resolution | 480p or 720p |
aspect_ratio | None listed, so any value is refused |
generate_audio | No audio; true is refused |
Can Grok Imagine make a video from text only?
Not on Sume. The catalog marks the model text_to_video: false, and its constraints read "image_url or first_frame_url required". For a clip from words alone, pick a model that lists text-to-video; Text to video API explains that request, and Kling 3 vs Grok Imagine sets this model beside kling-3.
What shape will the clip be?
The model takes no aspect_ratio, so crop the first frame to the shape you want, such as 9:16 for a vertical clip, before you send it. Vertical 9:16 video generation API lists which models take the field.
How much does the Grok Imagine video API cost?
Sume bills video at the provider's list price × 1.25, reserved when you submit. grok-imagine-video-1.5 has one per-second rate, $0.0125, at both 480p and 720p, so a 10-second clip reserves $0.13 and a 15-second clip $0.19, plus a 5.5% agent fee by default. pricing_skus shows it as per-video-second, and the finished job reports the billed amount in usage.cost. How much does an AI video cost? sets it beside the other models.
Can I add sound to a Grok Imagine clip?
Not in the same request: the catalog lists no audio for this model. Add a voiceover or music afterwards, as in Add a voiceover to a video, or pick a model that generates audio with the clip (AI video with sound).
Sources
Related posts
More in Models
- HeyGen text to speech API: endpoint, limits and price
HeyGen's API has a text to speech endpoint, POST /v3/voices/speech: up to 5,000 characters per call, catalog voices, word timestamps, $0.12 a minute.
- Higgsfield alternatives: studio, API and MCP compared
Higgsfield alternatives by the part you use: its studio apps, its API or its MCP link. fal, Kling, Replicate, Runway, Seedance and Sume, dated.
- Higgsfield vs Kling AI: studio or model maker?
Kling makes the Kling models and sells its own apps and API. Higgsfield is a multi-model studio that also runs Kling 3.0. Access and billing compared.
- Higgsfield AI vs Runway: apps, API, models and pricing
Higgsfield and Runway both sell a creative app and a video API billed in credits. How their models, API billing and job flow compare, from their pages.
Written by Sume