Google video resolution upcharge: Standard 0%, Fast 20%, Lite 60%
Going from 720p to 1080p adds 0% on Veo 3.1 Standard, 20% on Fast, 60% on Lite and 50% on Omni Flash on Sume. 4K adds 50% to 200%. Read 2026-10-06.

Moving from 720p to 1080p adds nothing on Veo 3.1 Standard, 20% on Fast, 60% on Lite, and 50% on Gemini Omni Flash through Sume. That means the question of which resolution to buy has a different answer on each model.
Percentages are computed from Google's per-second prices and Sume's billing table, both read 2026-10-06 or taken from the repo.
The ladder
Standard lists $0.40 a second at 720p and 1080p, so the upgrade is free, and $0.60 at 4K, so 4K adds 50% over 1080p. Fast lists $0.10, $0.12 and $0.30, so 1080p adds 20% and 4K adds 150% over 1080p. Lite lists $0.05 and $0.08, so 1080p adds 60% and there is no 4K row.
Sume's Omni goes $0.0375, $0.125, $0.1875 and $0.375, so each step adds 233%, 50% and 100%.
| Model | 720p to 1080p | 1080p to 4K | 720p to 4K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veo 3.1 Standard | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| Veo 3.1 Fast | 20% | 150% | 200% |
| Veo 3.1 Lite | 60% | not listed | not listed |
| Omni Flash on Sume | 50% | 100% | 200% |
What it means
On Standard, always use 1080p. On Fast, 1080p is a cheap upgrade for a clip you will publish. On Lite the 60% matters if you make thousands of clips, because Lite's appeal is cost.
For 4K, Fast and Omni on Sume both cost three times their 720p rate. Standard's 4K costs 1.5 times its 720p rate, but starts from a rate four times Fast's.
Resolution is not the only change
Google's tiers differ in more than price, and a cheaper tier at a higher resolution is not a copy of a dearer tier at a lower one. We did not compare picture quality. The ladder is a cost statement only.
Sume's Omni is one model at four resolutions, so the only thing that changes with the step is pixels and price. That makes the Omni ladder a cleaner test of what resolution is worth to you.
A volume example
At 1,000 seconds a month, the 720p-to-1080p step costs nothing extra on Standard, $20.00 more on Fast ($100 to $120), $30.00 more on Lite ($50 to $80), and $62.50 more on Omni through Sume ($125 to $187.50). The percentages look large on Lite and Omni, but the dollar amounts are modest until volume grows.
That is the point of the ladder: the percentage tells you how steep the step is, and your monthly seconds tell you whether the step is worth negotiating.
Sume note
Sume does not list a Veo model. Its Google video model is gemini-omni-flash-1.1, which takes 3 to 10 seconds at 360p, 720p, 1080p or 4K, in 16:9 or 9:16, with audio always on. Sume bills the provider list rate times 1.25 for each output second, so its rates are $0.0375, $0.125, $0.1875 and $0.375 a second.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- gpt-image-1-mini replacement on Sume: what each image id costs
gpt-image-1-mini shuts down December 1, 2026. Compare billed Sume prices per image for budget ids and see why mini token rates don't map one to one.
- 1,000 thumbnails at 1280x720 on GPT Image 2.5: $4 to $142 by quality
A 1280x720 GPT Image 2.5 thumbnail is about $0.004 at low and $0.142 at max on Sume. Cost per image and per 1,000 for all five quality levels.
- GPT Image 2.5 at 2560x1440: 4x the pixels of 720p, about 2x the price
Going from 1280x720 to 2560x1440 quadruples the pixels but only about doubles the GPT Image 2.5 output price at low, medium and high. Table inside.
- GPT Image 2.5 at 1536x864: high costs 3.8x medium. Is it worth it?
At 1536x864, high costs 3.9x medium on GPT Image 2.5 ($0.0105 vs $0.0404 on Sume). When to spend it, and when not.
Written by Sume