Genjutsu 15 s: 40, 104, 144 credits vs Sume Motion Transfer
Higgsfield lists Genjutsu at 40, 104 and 144 credits for 15 seconds. Here is what that works out to and how Sume's Motion Transfer model id is priced.

A 15-second Genjutsu clip costs 40 credits (about $2.00) at 480p, 104 credits (about $5.20) at 720p and 144 credits (about $7.20) at 1080p, according to Higgsfield's September 2026 post. Sume carries the same model as higgsfield-genjutsu (Motion Transfer) at 480p and 720p only, billed at provider list x 1.25.
What the credit prices work out to
The three Higgsfield tiers imply a flat $0.05 per credit. Dividing each total by 15 seconds gives a per-second figure that is easier to compare across vendors. The per-second numbers below are derived from the listed totals, not published rates.
| Resolution | Credits | Approx. price | Derived per second |
|---|---|---|---|
| 480p | 40 | $2.00 | $0.133 |
| 720p | 104 | $5.20 | $0.347 |
| 1080p | 144 | $7.20 | $0.480 |
Where resolution changes the bill
The jump from 480p to 720p is 2.6 times the credits for the same 15 seconds, so resolution is the main cost lever. If the output is a vertical social clip that will be compressed by the platform anyway, 480p or 720p is often enough for a first pass.
What Sume offers for the same model
Sume's docs describe higgsfield-genjutsu as Motion Transfer: one source video_url plus 1 to 8 reference_image_urls, at 480p or 720p, for 4 to 30 seconds. It is listed only when its provider is configured, so check the catalog before you build on it.
Sume bills list x 1.25 on every Video Router model. The docs do not publish a fixed price for this id, so read the live number from the catalog rather than multiplying by hand.
There is no 1080p option for this model id in the Sume docs. If you need 1080p Motion Transfer output, that tier is only listed on Higgsfield's side.
- Resolutions: 480p and 720p
- Duration: 4 to 30 seconds
- Inputs: source video plus 1 to 8 reference images
- Billing: provider list x 1.25
Credits versus a USD balance
Higgsfield's pricing is credit-based, so the dollar figures above are conversions that Higgsfield itself shows next to the credit counts. Sume instead shows a USD amount per request: the job is reserved against the workspace USD balance at submit and usage.cost reports the billable amount once the poll response arrives.
That difference matters for budgeting. With credits you plan around a monthly allotment; with a USD balance you can set a cap per request. A Motion Transfer test run of a few seconds at 480p is the cheapest way to confirm the output suits your footage before committing to longer clips.
Check the live catalog entry
Request the catalog entry and read capabilities and pricing before submitting:
curl https://api.sume.com/v1/video-router/models/higgsfield-genjutsu \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUME_API_KEY"
# If the id is missing, the provider is not configured for your workspace.Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- GPT Image 2.5 max quality: $0.21 at 1024, and when to use it
At 1024x1024, GPT Image 2.5 max output is $0.21072 and xhigh is $0.09366 before input tokens and Sume pricing. Quality levels, auto behavior and a request.
- GPT Image 2.5 quality auto reserves max on Sume: pin quality
Sume's image docs say quality auto reserves max, and auto size reserves the output token upper bound. What to set instead, plus the 1024 by 1024 figures.
- Grok Imagine: 20 MiB image cap and per-second prices
xAI lists Grok Imagine video at $0.020 to $0.080 a second and a 20 MiB image limit. On Sume, check the live catalog and add the x1.25 billing rule.
- Grok Imagine Image 2.0: auto means low, then medium
xAI's Grok Imagine Image 2.0 price list by quality, what auto resolves to, and how to read a model's price lines on Sume before you spend.
Written by Sume