Check price before submit: fal pricing endpoint vs Sume video models
fal prices by endpoint_id at GET /v1/models/pricing. Sume lists pricing_skus in GET /v1/videos/models, for example 0.0154 per 1000 video tokens on seedance-2.

Both platforms let you look up a price before you submit. fal exposes GET https://api.fal.ai/v1/models/pricing?endpoint_id=.... Sume's GET /v1/videos/models rows carry a pricing_skus object, and pricing lines on each image endpoint record. Neither replaces a dry run on your actual request, but both let a script refuse a job that is too expensive before it queues.
What each side documents
| Item | fal | Sume |
|---|---|---|
| Lookup | GET /v1/models/pricing?endpoint_id=... | GET /v1/videos/models; GET /v1/images/models/{id}/endpoints |
| Billing basis | Prepaid credits; successful outputs only | Wallet; images all-or-nothing, failed or canceled images are not billed |
| Example | flux/dev $0.025 per image | seedance-2: per-1000-video-tokens 0.0154 (docs example response) |
| Unit | Per image for the example above | Per 1,000 video tokens; image lines are cost_usd per image |
Arithmetic
fal: 40 images at $0.025 each is 40 x 0.025 = $1.00. Sume image: the docs example endpoint line is cost_usd 0.033 per output image, and you pay cost_usd x n, so n = 4 is 4 x 0.033 = 0.132. Sume video: the catalog value is 0.0154 for each 1,000 video tokens. For an illustrative job of 100,000 tokens (an assumed number to show the math, not a docs figure), 100 x 0.0154 = 1.54. The docs example does not state the token count for any clip length, so read the live catalog and do a dry run before relying on a total.
The docs example row is a sample response, so the live values can differ. Image endpoint pricing lines already include the Sume margin.
A Python check against the live catalog
This reads the video catalog and prints each model's SKUs. A budget guard can compare them before you submit.
import asyncio, os
import httpx
async def main():
headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['SUME_API_KEY']}"}
async with httpx.AsyncClient(timeout=30) as client:
r = await client.get("https://api.sume.com/v1/videos/models", headers=headers)
r.raise_for_status()
for m in r.json()["data"]:
print(m["id"], m.get("pricing_skus"))
asyncio.run(main())Where to be careful
- A SKU is a rate, not a quote. The job size decides the total.
- fal bills successful outputs only and keeps results about an hour; Sume releases or refunds the reservation on failed jobs. Both follow the pay-for-success idea, but check each page for the exact rule.
- For a hard cap on calls to Sume's hosted MCP, add
max_spend_usdor usedry_run.
Building a budget guard
A guard needs three inputs: the rate (from the pricing lookup), your estimate of the job size, and a ceiling. Multiply the first two and compare with the third. For fal, the rate is per endpoint; for Sume, read pricing_skus and, for images, the pricing lines. When the estimate is hard to make, such as tokens for a video, use the Sume dry_run or generation_admission_preview over MCP, which return an estimate without creating a job.
Log the rate and the estimate with the job id, so a surprise on the invoice can be matched to a decision your code made.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- First-frame stills for 500 SKUs: five image models priced
Generating 500 product first frames costs $32.95 on gpt-image-2.5 high, up to $131.95 on gpt-image-2. A per-model price grid from Sume prices, read 2026-10-05.
- Cost of your first Sume avatar clip: $0.95 plus the video by tier
The avatar is a flat $0.95 once. A first 10 second clip adds $1.84 standard, $2.45 plus or $5.50 max, so the first one costs $2.79, $3.40 or $6.45.
- Five avatar creators, 50 Q4 UGC clips: $188.75 on Sume, line by line
Five Sume avatars at $0.95 each plus 50 fifteen-second Plus-quality clips at $0.245 a second comes to $188.75. Here is every line of that Q4 UGC budget.
- Caption typo: re-caption for $0.20 or regenerate the clip on Sume?
Re-running captions is a flat $0.20 for a video up to 60 s. Regenerating a 10 s Wan 720p clip is $1.25. Cost ratios for five clip types.
Written by Sume