A 170-word avatar script in 34-word sentences plans 70 s: refused

Why a 170-word script of five 34-word sentences needs 70 seconds in Avatar 1.0, past the 60-second cap, and how to split it into two 35-second videos.

4 min readSume
All posts

A script of 170 words is not safe under the 60-second limit, because the limit is on planned seconds, not on words. If the script is five sentences of 34 words, each sentence is split into two 17-word parts of 7 seconds, which makes ten clips and 70 seconds in total. The planner then refuses it with the message "Avatar video script is estimated at 70 seconds; maximum is 60 seconds. Shorten the script or split it into multiple videos." Even a plain division gives 170 / 2.8 = 60.7 seconds, which is already over; the split rounding adds the rest.

Where the extra ten seconds come from

In the avatar-workflows package of the Sume repo, speech is estimated at 2.8 words per second, a clip is 4 to 12 seconds, and a sentence of more than 33 words is cut in equal parts. A 34-word sentence becomes 17 + 17. Each part is rounded up to a whole second: ceil(17 / 2.8) = 7. Two parts make 14 seconds, where 34 words would need 12.1. Five such sentences make 70.

The Avatar videos docs describe the outcome: the talking video accepts 4 to 60 seconds. They do not publish the planner constants, so treat the figures here as the behavior I measured on 2026-10-08, not as a promise.

Same 170 words, different shapes (read 2026-10-08)
Script shapeClipsPlanned secondsResult
5 sentences x 34 words1070Refused, over 60
10 sentences x 16 words, plus 10 words664Refused, over 60
Two videos of 5 sentences x 17 words5 each35 eachAccepted, two jobs

Why shorter sentences do not rescue it

It is tempting to rewrite the long sentences and keep one video. Ten sentences of 16 words pack two to a clip, 32 words each, planned at 12 seconds. That is five clips and 60 seconds for 160 words, and the last 10 words add a sixth clip of 4 seconds, for 64. Any script above about 168 words cannot fit, because 60 seconds times 2.8 words per second is 168, and the planner rounds each clip up. So the fix is a second video.

Fix: split into two videos

Split the script at a section break into two halves of about 85 words, so each plans at 35 seconds when the sentences are 17 words.

  • Count words per sentence and flag any over 33.
  • Estimate total seconds as the sum of ceil(words / 2.8) per clip, not total words / 2.8.
  • Keep the total at or under 60 for each job.
  • Split at a topic change, not mid-argument, and use the same avatar handle in both jobs.
  • Join the two outputs with POST /v1/timeline-1.0/render, which bills $0.10 per output minute, rounded up.

What Sume does not do

Sume does not trim your script or lengthen the window to fit. The refusal comes before any render, so a script that is too long costs nothing, but it also gives you no partial result. If you send scenes instead of a script, the same cap applies to the sum of scene durations, with a message that talks about scenes rather than a script.

Sources

Related posts

More in Sume Avatar 1.0

All Sume Avatar 1.0 posts

Written by Sume