Thousand-clip batch: the cents a frame ratio adds on Seedance 2.5
On Sume, 4:3 costs 1.7% less than 16:9 at 480p but 0.6% more at 720p and 1080p for a 10-second Seedance 2.5 clip. 3:4 mirrors it against 9:16.

On Sume, a 10-second Seedance 2.5 clip in 4:3 costs 1.7 percent less than 16:9 at 480p, and 0.6 percent more at 720p and 1080p. The 3:4 portrait ratio behaves the same way against 9:16 (read 2026-10-09).
The percentages by resolution
Most pricing tables compare 16:9 with 9:16 and stop. The 4:3 and 3:4 frames are the odd ones, because their pixel counts after rounding do not follow the same step as the others.
| Resolution | 16:9 | 4:3 | 4:3 vs 16:9 | 3:4 | 3:4 vs 9:16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 480p | $2.69 | $2.64 | -1.7% | $2.64 | -1.7% |
| 720p | $5.78 | $5.81 | +0.6% | $5.81 | +0.6% |
| 1080p | $14.22 | $14.31 | +0.6% | $14.31 | +0.6% |
Use it in a batch estimate
The effect is tiny per clip, but a batch of 200 clips at 1080p in 4:3 instead of 16:9 adds $17.92. Compute the estimate with the real ratio before you set a cap.
rates = { # 10 s clip, customer USD, from the Sume price tool (read 2026-10-09)
("480p", "16:9"): 2.68677, ("480p", "4:3"): 2.640225,
("720p", "16:9"): 5.778, ("720p", "4:3"): 5.814434,
("1080p", "16:9"): 14.2155, ("1080p", "4:3"): 14.305094,
}
def batch(n, res, ratio):
return round(n * rates[(res, ratio)], 2)
print(batch(200, "1080p", "4:3") - batch(200, "1080p", "16:9"))Where it matters
A single 10-second clip differs by cents. A thousand 10-second 1080p clips in 4:3 cost $14305.09 against $14215.50 in 16:9, a difference of $89.59.
At 480p, a thousand clips in 4:3 cost $2640.23 against $2686.77 in 16:9, so 4:3 saves $46.55.
Both effects are well under the price of one extra resolution step. Moving 1000 clips from 720p to 1080p in 16:9 adds $8437.50.
Gotchas
- These are tool outputs for 10 seconds; the percentages are stable because price scales linearly in seconds.
- Pick the ratio for the placement. A sub-1-percent difference is not a reason to crop or distort.
autoandadaptiveare accepted ratios in the Video Router catalog but pin a real ratio when you budget.- Always compare
usage.costfrom completed jobs with your estimate before you scale up.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- Timeline render: 61 seconds costs double 60 on Sume
Sume Timeline reserves $0.10 per output minute, rounded up: a 60-second render is $0.10, a 61-second render is $0.20, a 30-minute render is $3.00.
- Twelve 45-second Shorts a month: what each Sume video model costs
Twelve vertical 45 s Shorts a month cost $41.70 on MiniMax H3 at 768p and $68.70 on Wan 3.0 at 720p, up to $313.21 on Seedance 2.5 at 720p, Timeline included.
- Vidu 500 RMB top-up: 16,000 credits is 1,777 seconds of Q4 at 540p
Vidu's smallest API package is 500 RMB for 16,000 credits. How many Q4 Preview seconds that buys at each resolution, and the flat 32 credits per RMB.
- Vidu Q4 Preview 4K costs 8.7x the 540p price: 78 credits vs 9
Vidu's table runs 9 to 78 credits per second, 540p to 4K. The two published USD points ($0.045, $0.39) imply half a cent per credit. Plus Sume's 4K row.
Written by Sume