Vidu Q4 after Nov 30: +42.9% per second, and what stays flat on Sume
The Vidu Q4 image and reference-to-video discount ends Nov 30, raising rates 42.9%. Here is the 1,000-second bill before and after, next to flat Sume rates.

The cliff
Vidu's release puts 30% off image-to-video and reference-to-video through November 30. When it ends, the price rises from 70% of list to 100%, which is a 42.9% increase (1 / 0.70 = 1.4286). At 540P that moves $0.0315 to $0.045 per second, and at 4K it moves $0.273 to $0.39. Sume does not list Vidu; its video rates are fixed in the catalog and show no end date in the catalog.
What 1,000 seconds costs before and after
A thousand seconds is a realistic quarter of work for a small team: about 66 clips of 15 seconds. The table shows the change for the two published endpoints.
| Tier | Until Nov 30 $/s | From Dec 1 $/s | Change per second |
|---|---|---|---|
| 540P | $0.0315 | $0.045 | +$0.0135 |
| 4K | $0.273 | $0.39 | +$0.117 |
The same 1,000 seconds
At 540P that is $31.50 inside the window and $45.00 after. At 4K it is $273.00 inside and $390.00 after, a $117.00 difference. Against Sume: 1,000 seconds of Omni at 4K is $375.00, Wan 3.0 at 1080p is $250.00, and Wan 3.0 at 720p is $125.00. None of these change on December 1.
The release does not say what happens to pricing after the Preview label is dropped, and nothing else in it promises a rate beyond November 30. Do not assume the list rates persist.
Planning around a date
If you will keep producing after the window, price the project at list and treat the discount as a bonus. If the work is a one-off, the discount is real money at 4K. If a stable unit cost matters for client quotes, a catalog rate with no stated end date is easier to quote. Check a Sume row's current rate in the catalog before quoting. For a trial sized to the window, see the test-batch planner.
Three ways to handle the date
There are 53 days between October 8 and November 30. How you use them depends on what the work is.
The point is not that one vendor is better. It is that a quote written today with the discounted number is wrong from December 1, while a quote written with a catalog rate that shows no end date is on firmer ground.
- Front-load: if a 4K batch is already scripted, run it inside the window. For 300 seconds of 4K image-to-video that is 300 x $0.273 = $81.90 instead of 300 x $0.39 = $117.00, a saving of $35.10.
- Test only: if you are choosing a model, spend the discount on a trial and price the real project at list, which is 42.9% higher.
- Hold flat: if you quote clients per second, use a row whose catalog rate shows no end date. On Sume, Wan 3.0 at 1080p is $0.25 per second and Omni at 1080p is $0.1875 per second, both listed in the catalog with no end date.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- Voice API cost gap up to 213x: what drives it, how to price yours
Krisp's newsletter reports a voice API cost gap of up to 213x across OpenAI, Gemini and Qwen. Why list TTS prices differ far less, and how to normalise yours.
- Voiceover cost for a 60-second video: about $0.043 on Sume TTS
A 60-second voiceover is roughly 900 characters, which bills about $0.043 on Sume TTS. The cost at 600 to 1,200 characters, and how to measure your own script.
- Wallet reserve for a full queue of Seedance 2.5 clips, by plan
Sume reserves the estimate at submit. A full queue of 5 s Seedance 2.5 720p clips ($2.889 each) reserves $17.33 on Free and $346.68 on Scale.
- Wan 3.0 prices for 10, 20 and 30 second clips: $0.63 to $7.50
Wan 3.0 on Sume costs $0.63 for 10 s at 480p and $7.50 for 30 s at 1080p. Nine prices, the per-second list rates and the rounding rule.
Written by Sume