Thousand-clip batch: the cents a frame ratio adds on Seedance 2.5
On Sume, 4:3 costs 1.7% less than 16:9 at 480p but 0.6% more at 720p and 1080p for a 10-second Seedance 2.5 clip. 3:4 mirrors it against 9:16.

On Sume, a 10-second Seedance 2.5 clip in 4:3 costs 1.7 percent less than 16:9 at 480p, and 0.6 percent more at 720p and 1080p. The 3:4 portrait ratio behaves the same way against 9:16 (read 2026-10-09).
The percentages by resolution
Most pricing tables compare 16:9 with 9:16 and stop. The 4:3 and 3:4 frames are the odd ones, because their pixel counts after rounding do not follow the same step as the others.
| Resolution | 16:9 | 4:3 | 4:3 vs 16:9 | 3:4 | 3:4 vs 9:16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 480p | $2.69 | $2.64 | -1.7% | $2.64 | -1.7% |
| 720p | $5.78 | $5.81 | +0.6% | $5.81 | +0.6% |
| 1080p | $14.22 | $14.31 | +0.6% | $14.31 | +0.6% |
Use it in a batch estimate
The effect is tiny per clip, but a batch of 200 clips at 1080p in 4:3 instead of 16:9 adds $17.92. Compute the estimate with the real ratio before you set a cap.
rates = { # 10 s clip, customer USD, from the Sume price tool (read 2026-10-09)
("480p", "16:9"): 2.68677, ("480p", "4:3"): 2.640225,
("720p", "16:9"): 5.778, ("720p", "4:3"): 5.814434,
("1080p", "16:9"): 14.2155, ("1080p", "4:3"): 14.305094,
}
def batch(n, res, ratio):
return round(n * rates[(res, ratio)], 2)
print(batch(200, "1080p", "4:3") - batch(200, "1080p", "16:9"))Where it matters
A single 10-second clip differs by cents. A thousand 10-second 1080p clips in 4:3 cost $14305.09 against $14215.50 in 16:9, a difference of $89.59.
At 480p, a thousand clips in 4:3 cost $2640.23 against $2686.77 in 16:9, so 4:3 saves $46.55.
Both effects are well under the price of one extra resolution step. Moving 1000 clips from 720p to 1080p in 16:9 adds $8437.50.
Gotchas
- These are tool outputs for 10 seconds; the percentages are stable because price scales linearly in seconds.
- Pick the ratio for the placement. A sub-1-percent difference is not a reason to crop or distort.
autoandadaptiveare accepted ratios in the Video Router catalog but pin a real ratio when you budget.- Always compare
usage.costfrom completed jobs with your estimate before you scale up.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- Timeline plan endpoint: a free estimate before a 91 s render ($0.20)
POST /v1/timeline-1.0/plan is unbilled and returns billable_minutes and estimated_cost_usd_micros. A 91-second render is 2 minutes, $0.20; 120 s is the same.
- Timeline render: 60 seconds costs $0.10, 61 seconds costs $0.20
Sume bills timeline renders per ceil(output minute) at $0.10, minimum 1 minute, maximum 30. One extra second can double the render bill. The table and a fix.
- Timeline render: 61 seconds costs double 60 on Sume
Sume Timeline reserves $0.10 per output minute, rounded up: a 60-second render is $0.10, a 61-second render is $0.20, a 30-minute render is $3.00.
- 10 hours of audio: Sume STT $6.00 vs Scribe v2 $2.20
Transcribing 10 hours of customer calls: Sume's $0.01 per audio minute is $6.00; ElevenLabs lists Scribe v2 at $0.22 per hour, $2.20. Read 2026-10-09.
Written by Sume