sume/auto or a pinned image model: what the response shows

With sume/auto, job.model stays sume/auto, the model list omits it and the family is never named. A pinned id echoes back as requested.

5 min readSume
All posts

Pin an image model when you need to know what made the picture, and use sume/auto when you only need a good picture. The two differ in what Sume tells you afterwards. With a pinned id, the response model echoes the id you requested. With sume/auto, job.model stays sume/auto, GET /v1/images/models does not list it, and Sume never discloses which family ran.

Side by side

These behaviors are documented on the Sume Image API page, read 2026-10-08.

Image API: Auto against a pinned model, read 2026-10-08
Questionsume/autoPinned catalog id
What does the response model say?sume/autoThe id you requested
Listed in GET /v1/images/models?NoYes
Is the family disclosed?No, neverYou chose it
Can you read per-model capabilities first?No single listYes, from the model entry
Provider routing fields (provider.only, allow_fallbacks)Accepted, no effectAccepted, no effect
What cost meansUSD Sume bills to your walletUSD Sume bills to your wallet

Where the choice changes the bill

The clearest example is ChatGPT Image 2.5. If you pin it and set quality: "low", you pay about 1 cent per 1024-class image. If you leave quality at auto, Sume reserves the max price at admission. If you omit it, the model runs at high, around 6 to 7 cents. The Image API page also describes a quality field with auto, low, medium, high, xhigh and max, so set it explicitly on any request where the price matters.

A practical split

  • Exploration, mood boards, one-off assets: sume/auto, since you do not need to know the family.
  • Brand work that must look the same next month: pin the id, because with Auto you cannot see which family produced the image and so cannot repeat it on purpose.
  • Comparisons between models: always pin, since Auto cannot tell you which side of the test you are looking at.
  • Cost control at volume: pin the id and the quality, then compute the price from the catalog before the batch.

Legacy aliases

Image 1.0 (POST /v1/image-1.0/generate) is a compatibility alias for Image Router Auto, and Sume will retire it. For new integrations, use POST /v1/images with either sume/auto or a pinned catalog id, as described on the Image API page and in the Models overview.

One more difference shows up in logs. A pinned request leaves a job whose model field you can group by, so a weekly cost report can split spend per model. Auto jobs all fold into one sume/auto bucket, which is fine for a single team budget but gives you nothing to compare. If you want to learn which model suits a prompt type, run a pinned test set first, record the prices, and only then decide whether Auto is good enough for the routine traffic. Retired models follow a similar rule: a retired id such as nano-banana-2 still works and runs as its successor, and the job stores the new id, so check the stored model after a migration.

Sources

Related posts

More in Comparisons

All Comparisons posts

Written by Sume