sume/auto or a pinned image model: what the response shows
With sume/auto, job.model stays sume/auto, the model list omits it and the family is never named. A pinned id echoes back as requested.

Pin an image model when you need to know what made the picture, and use sume/auto when you only need a good picture. The two differ in what Sume tells you afterwards. With a pinned id, the response model echoes the id you requested. With sume/auto, job.model stays sume/auto, GET /v1/images/models does not list it, and Sume never discloses which family ran.
Side by side
These behaviors are documented on the Sume Image API page, read 2026-10-08.
| Question | sume/auto | Pinned catalog id |
|---|---|---|
What does the response model say? | sume/auto | The id you requested |
Listed in GET /v1/images/models? | No | Yes |
| Is the family disclosed? | No, never | You chose it |
| Can you read per-model capabilities first? | No single list | Yes, from the model entry |
Provider routing fields (provider.only, allow_fallbacks) | Accepted, no effect | Accepted, no effect |
What cost means | USD Sume bills to your wallet | USD Sume bills to your wallet |
Where the choice changes the bill
The clearest example is ChatGPT Image 2.5. If you pin it and set quality: "low", you pay about 1 cent per 1024-class image. If you leave quality at auto, Sume reserves the max price at admission. If you omit it, the model runs at high, around 6 to 7 cents. The Image API page also describes a quality field with auto, low, medium, high, xhigh and max, so set it explicitly on any request where the price matters.
A practical split
- Exploration, mood boards, one-off assets:
sume/auto, since you do not need to know the family. - Brand work that must look the same next month: pin the id, because with Auto you cannot see which family produced the image and so cannot repeat it on purpose.
- Comparisons between models: always pin, since Auto cannot tell you which side of the test you are looking at.
- Cost control at volume: pin the id and the quality, then compute the price from the catalog before the batch.
Legacy aliases
Image 1.0 (POST /v1/image-1.0/generate) is a compatibility alias for Image Router Auto, and Sume will retire it. For new integrations, use POST /v1/images with either sume/auto or a pinned catalog id, as described on the Image API page and in the Models overview.
One more difference shows up in logs. A pinned request leaves a job whose model field you can group by, so a weekly cost report can split spend per model. Auto jobs all fold into one sume/auto bucket, which is fine for a single team budget but gives you nothing to compare. If you want to learn which model suits a prompt type, run a pinned test set first, record the prices, and only then decide whether Auto is good enough for the routine traffic. Retired models follow a similar rule: a retired id such as nano-banana-2 still works and runs as its successor, and the job stores the new id, so check the stored model after a migration.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Sume Format vs pasting the same prompt each time: what changes
A Format stores the house style once, then each API run sends only inputs. How the instruction is composed, what a run returns, and the spend cap.
- STT language: Sume language_code hint vs the 60 languages MAI lists
Sume STT takes an optional language_code and auto-detects when omitted. A tracker lists MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming at 60 languages; Sume's docs state no count.
- Suno Premier credits cost 25% less than Pro: and the Sume math
Suno Pro is $8 for 2,500 credits and Premier $24 for 10,000, so a credit is $0.0032 vs $0.0024. At $0.125 a track, Sume breaks even at 64 or 192 tracks.
- Swapping a face in a 12-second clip: manual steps vs one request
What changing a face in a short clip involves when you do it yourself, and what Sume's beta face-swap request replaces. Fields, limits and the cost ceiling.
Written by Sume