Seedance vs Grok Imagine: inputs, length, sound and cost

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 animates one image into a silent clip, billed per second. Seedance 2.x adds text, end frames, references and sound, billed by token.

4 min readSume
All posts

Seedance and Grok Imagine differ most in how much a request can steer and how the meter runs. Seedance 2.0 and 2.5 accept reference images, videos and audio, generate sound by default, reach 1080p, and seedance-2.5 runs to 30 seconds; they are billed by video tokens, so cost scales with pixels as well as seconds. The Grok model takes none of those inputs and bills a flat $0.0125 per second.

This compares the models as Sume's POST /v1/videos serves them, not the consumer apps, from Sume's video catalog and pricing code and the Sume API reference, read 2026-09-28.

Where do Seedance and Grok Imagine differ?

The ids are seedance-2 (Seedance 2.0), seedance-2.5 and grok-imagine-video-1.5. grok-imagine-video-1.5 only animates one still, with no text-only mode; the single-model posts for it and for Seedance 2.5 carry the full field lists. The rows below are the ones that separate them:

Rows that differ, from Sume's video catalog and pricing code and the Sume API reference, read 2026-09-28. Rates are provider list × 1.25, before the 5.5% agent fee.
`seedance-2``seedance-2.5``grok-imagine-video-1.5`
Reference images, videos, audioYesYesNo
Generated soundOn by defaultOn by defaultNever
Longest clip15 s30 s15 s
Top resolution1080p1080p720p
Meter$0.0175 per 1,000 video tokens$0.02675 per 1,000 video tokens (more at 1080p)$0.0125 per second

What can Seedance steer that Grok Imagine can't?

Seedance takes reference files next to the prompt: images for a character or product look, a video for motion, audio for a voice or beat. Audio and video references are honored by the Seedance 2.x models. The single-still model has no field for any of them, so its look comes from that still and the prompt alone.

Audio follows the same split. Seedance writes dialogue, music or effects into the clip unless generate_audio is set to false; the other returns no audio track, so a voiceover or soundtrack is a separate step.

How does token billing compare with per-second billing?

The per-second meter ignores frame size. Seedance bills video tokens: width × height × seconds × 24 fps ÷ 1,024, which is 21,600 tokens per second of 720p 16:9 video, so a larger frame costs more even at the same length. In current code, Sume's Seedance estimate has no audio term, so sound on or off does not change it. Seedance video token pricing works the formula at other sizes.

Amounts Sume reserves on submit for a 720p 16:9 clip, computed from Sume's pricing code and the × 1.25 rule in Video generation, read 2026-09-28. Before the 5.5% agent fee; list prices can change.
Clip`grok-imagine-video-1.5``seedance-2``seedance-2.5`
5 s$0.07$1.89$2.89
10 s$0.13$3.78$5.78
15 s$0.19$5.67$8.67

Which one should I use?

  • Use grok-imagine-video-1.5 when one still plus silent motion is enough and volume makes the per-second meter matter: 10 seconds at 720p reserves $0.13.
  • Use Seedance when references must hold a look, the clip needs its own sound, runs past 15 seconds (seedance-2.5) or needs 1080p. The same 10 seconds at 720p reserves $3.78 on seedance-2.
  • For Seedance at lower token rates, see Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Mini; for the single-still model against Kling, see Kling vs Grok Imagine.

Sources

Related posts

More in Models

All Models posts

Written by Sume