Seedance 2.5 vs Gemini Omni: length, references and editing

Seedance 2.5 and Gemini Omni Flash compared on published specs: 30 vs 10 seconds, reference rules, extension and edit mode. Ids on Sume and on Google's page.

4 min readSume
All posts

Seedance 2.5 generates 4 to 30 seconds per request on Sume; Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 generates 3 to 10 seconds, and adds video editing and extension. Google's Gemini API names the model gemini-omni-1.1-flash, while Sume's catalog id is gemini-omni-flash-1.1.

Numbers below come from Google's Gemini Omni page, ByteDance's launch post and Sume's video docs. This is a spec comparison, not a ranking.

How do the specs compare?

The table mixes vendor pages with Sume's catalog, noted per row.

Seedance 2.5 vs Gemini Omni Flash specs, read 2026-09-29.
SpecSeedance 2.5Gemini Omni Flash 1.1
Length per request4 to 30 s (Sume)3 to 10 s (Sume, Google)
Resolutions480p, 720p, 1080p (Sume)360p, 720p, 1080p, 4K (Sume, Google)
Aspect ratios21:9, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16 (Sume)16:9, 9:16 (Sume, Google)
Reference types on Sumeimage, video, audioimage, video (no audio)
Video referencesVendor: up to 10 clipsGoogle: up to 3 clips of 3 s or less
ExtensionVendor task, 30 sAppends up to 40 s total (Google)

Which one edits an existing video?

On Sume, gemini-omni-flash-1.1 exposes an edit mode through the Video Router video_url field. seedance-2.5 has no documented edit mode on Sume; see Seedance 2.5 video editing.

What limits does Google state for references?

Google says reference videos are capped at 3 clips of 3 seconds or less, audio in a reference is ignored, and referencing or reasoning across multiple videos is not supported.

How do I choose?

Choose on the constraint. Clips over 10 seconds, or audio references: Seedance 2.5. In-place edit or extension by prompt: Gemini Omni Flash 1.1. Compare against the earlier model in Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni Flash.

Sources

Related posts

More in Models

All Models posts

Written by Sume