One 15-second ad in 3 ratios: render once, crop twice on Sume
A 15-second 1080p master on Wan 3.0 costs $3.75, and two $0.02 crops give 1:1 and 9:16 cutdowns for $3.79. Vidu Q4 at 540P is $0.675 per ratio.

The short answer
For a 15-second ad in three aspect ratios, one 1080p render on Sume's Wan 3.0 plus two crops costs 15 x $0.25 + 2 x $0.02 = $3.79. Three separate renders cost 3 x $3.75 = $11.25. Vidu Q4 Preview, which Sume does not list, would be 15 x $0.045 = $0.675 per ratio at 540P list, or $2.025 for three, and 15 x $0.39 = $5.85 per ratio at 4K. Vidu's release does not state its supported aspect ratios, so confirm them with the vendor.
The comparison
Each row below covers a 15-second ad delivered in three ratios. The crop route uses Sume's video filter, which costs $0.02 per job.
| Route | Arithmetic | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Vidu Q4, 540P, three renders at list | 3 x 15 x $0.045 | $2.025 |
| Vidu Q4, 4K, three renders at list | 3 x 15 x $0.39 | $17.55 |
| Sume Wan 3.0 1080p, three renders | 3 x 15 x $0.25 | $11.25 |
| Sume Wan 3.0 1080p, one render + two crops | 15 x $0.25 + 2 x $0.02 | $3.79 |
| Sume Seedance 2.0 1080p, three renders | 3 x 15 x $0.8505 | $38.2725 |
| Sume Omni 1080p | not possible: 3-10 s per clip | - |
What a crop costs you
The crop cuts pixels. A 1920x1080 master cropped to 9:16 leaves about 608 x 1080, and a 1:1 crop leaves 1080 x 1080. That is fine for a feed ad at 1080 high, but it throws away two thirds of the frame for vertical. Compose the master so the subject sits in the centre third, keep captions and logos inside that strip, and test the vertical crop before you approve the master. A crop of a 16:9 frame will always sit tighter than a native vertical shot, and fast sideways motion can leave the strip.
The crop route also keeps the three versions identical in timing and content, which a three-render approach does not, because each render is a fresh generation.
When to render three times
If each ratio needs its own composition, as with a close-up for vertical, render natively. Check that your row lists the ratio in supported_aspect_ratios through GET /v1/videos/models in the video generation docs. The video filter crop takes fractions of the frame, with x and y in 0 to 1 and width and height in 0.05 to 1, as the video filter docs describe.
Sizing the saving: for a campaign of 20 ads, rendering three ratios each with Wan 3.0 at 1080p costs 20 x $11.25 = $225.00. Rendering once and cropping twice costs 20 x $3.79 = $75.80. The difference is $149.20, which is 66% of the three-render cost, and it grows with the model price: at Seedance 2.0 1080p the same campaign is 20 x $38.2725 = $765.45 against 20 x ($12.7575 + $0.04) = $255.95.
Sources
Related posts
More in Use cases
- One 20-second ad, eight markets: recast the presenter for $60.00
Localize one 20-second ad with eight local presenters using H3 Max Recast on Sume: $60.00 at 768p, $90.00 at 1080p. Source rules and a per-market table.
- One 6-second Omni clip a day for 30 days: $22.50 at 720p on Sume
A daily 6-second clip for 30 days is 180 seconds: $6.75 at 360p, $22.50 at 720p, $33.75 at 1080p and $67.50 at 4K on Sume's gemini-omni-flash-1.1 row.
- One 640x640 render: TikTok 1:1 ad size and a square Short
A 640x640 square clears TikTok's 1:1 non-Spark minimum and fits YouTube's square-or-vertical Shorts rule. A 45-second render is $0.10 on Sume Timeline.
- One music bed, three TikTok ratios: three renders for $0.425
A 9:16, 16:9 and 1:1 TikTok ad can share one $0.125 bed. Each Timeline render at 1080x1920, 1920x1080 and 1080x1080 is $0.10 up to a minute, so $0.425 in all.
Written by Sume