Nano Banana 2 thumbnail tier: Google 0.5K to 4K vs Sume billed
Google's 2026 Nano Banana 2 per-image prices from 0.5K to 4K next to what Sume bills, to pick a thumbnail tier by cost rather than habit.
A thumbnail rarely needs 4K. Nano Banana 2 prices by resolution tier, so the tier you pick is the largest lever on cost. Google's Gemini API pricing page lists Standard per-image prices for gemini-3.1-flash-image: $0.045 at 0.5K, $0.067 at 1K, $0.101 at 2K and $0.151 at 4K, from an output-token rate of $60 per million image tokens.
Sume's catalog lists the same model as google/nano-banana-2 with tiers 512 (alias 0.5K), 1K, 2K and 4K. Sume bills the fal list price times 1.25 (the SUME_STANDARD_MARGIN_RATIO documented in the repo), so the figures differ from Google's direct price. The list prices in the Sume pricing code are $0.06, $0.08, $0.12 and $0.16.
The ladder
| Tier | Google direct list | Sume list basis | Sume billed (x1.25) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5K | 0.045 | 0.06 | 0.075 |
| 1K | 0.067 | 0.08 | 0.10 |
| 2K | 0.101 | 0.12 | 0.15 |
| 4K | 0.151 | 0.16 | 0.20 |
Choosing a tier for a thumbnail
Google's page maps 1K to 1024 by 1024 pixels and 2K to 2048 by 2048. A card thumbnail shown at a few hundred pixels needs neither the 4K tier nor often the 2K tier. A sensible plan is to generate candidates at 1K, then rerun only the winner at 2K if you need a hero image.
- Ten candidates at 1K on Sume: $1.00 billed.
- Ten candidates at 2K on Sume: $1.50 billed.
- Ten candidates at 4K on Sume: $2.00 billed.
curl -X POST https://api.sume.com/v1/images \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUME_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"google/nano-banana-2","prompt":"Bold product thumbnail, large empty left third","resolution":"1K","aspect_ratio":"16:9","n":4}'
Where the gap comes from
Going direct to Google is cheaper per image at every tier in the table. What the Sume price buys is one key, one wallet and the same request shape across 19 image ids, which matters when a thumbnail job falls back to another model. Compare on your own volume before you decide.
How this was checked
Vendor facts come from the pages listed in the sources, read on 2026-10-05. Sume facts come from the Image API docs and the catalog code on main on the same date. Catalogs and limits change, so read the descriptors from GET /v1/images/models before you pin a number in production code.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- Nightly voice-agent test calls: 200 utterances, a month of TTS
A nightly regression run of 200 utterances at 100 characters is 600,000 characters a month: $9.00 on MAI Flash, $13.20 on MAI-Voice-2.1, $28.50 on Sume.
- 360p drafts before a 1080p final: when Omni drafting pays off
A 10 s Omni 360p draft costs $0.38 and a 1080p take $1.88. From the second attempt on, drafting first is cheaper. Break-even table on Sume, read 2026-10-05.
- Omni 4K costs twice 1080p per second on Sume: is it worth it?
On Sume, Omni 4K is $0.375 a second against $0.1875 at 1080p: exactly double. A 10 s clip is $3.75 versus $1.88. When the extra pixels pay for themselves.
- Omni 9:16 and 16:9 360p drafts of one prompt: 75 cents for the pair
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash takes only 16:9 and 9:16. Draft both at 360p for 10 seconds each, about $0.75 on Sume, before choosing which one to finish.
Written by Sume