Ideogram 4.5 low, medium, high: a four-image call costs $0.15 to $1.10
Ideogram 4.5 quality sets the price, not the size. Sume billed cost per image and per n=4 call at low, medium and high, with a draft-then-final plan.

On Ideogram 4.5 the quality field is the price dial. The Sume Image API page gives the list price by quality, the same for all sizes: $0.03 low, $0.06 medium, $0.22 high per image. Sume bills list times 1.25, and medium is the default when you omit quality.
Resolution (1K or 2K) does not change that price. So the sensible knob for iteration is quality, not size.
Per image and per four-image call
n is capped by a per-model ceiling in the catalog, and 4 is the ceiling for Ideogram 4.5 in the repo's catalog data.
| quality | List per image | Billed per image | Billed, n=4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| low | 0.03 | 0.0375 | 0.15 |
| medium (default) | 0.06 | 0.075 | 0.30 |
| high | 0.22 | 0.275 | 1.10 |
Draft low, finish high
Ideogram's own docs describe an edit path where references turn the text into an edit instruction. You can use the same idea for cost control: draft four options at low ($0.15 total), pick one, then run it once at high as an edit with the draft as the first reference ($0.275). The pair costs $0.425 billed, against $1.10 for a four-image high call.
curl -X POST https://api.sume.com/v1/images \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUME_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"ideogram/ideogram-v4.5","prompt":"Poster headline: OPEN LATE","quality":"low","resolution":"1K","aspect_ratio":"3:4","n":4}'
Caveat
The edit pass is a new generation, not a refinement of identical pixels, so compare it with the draft before you commit to the plan. Prices are list-based and the usage.cost field in each response shows the billed amount for that call.
How this was checked
Vendor facts come from the pages listed in the sources, read on 2026-10-05. Sume facts come from the Image API docs and the catalog code on main on the same date. Catalogs and limits change, so read the descriptors from GET /v1/images/models before you pin a number in production code.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- A misspelled Ideogram 4.5 edit still bills: budget for retries
On Sume a completed image edit is billed in full even if the text came back wrong. Only failed or cancelled jobs are free. How to budget retries.
- How many GPT Image 2.5 images does $10 buy on Sume?
At 1024x1024, $10 buys 1,355 low-quality, 606 medium, 151 high, 85 xhigh or 37 max images on Sume. The per-tier table, the script, and what shifts the count.
- Is Sume really fal list x 1.25? Four fal pages checked
Wan 3.0, Kling v3 Pro, MiniMax H3 Max and Ideogram 4.5 on fal, read 2026-10-05, set against Sume's per-second and per-image rates. The ratio is 1.25.
- Kling 3 at 1080p: $0.14 a second, 44% below Wan 3.0's $0.25 on Sume
On Sume, silent Kling 3 is $0.14 a second at 1080p and Wan 3.0 is $0.25. A 10-second 1080p clip is $1.40 on Kling and $2.50 on Wan; Wan reaches 30 s.
Written by Sume