Nano Banana 2 on Runway (5 to 16 credits) vs Google direct per image
Runway sells Gemini 3.1 Flash Image ($0.05 to $0.16); Google lists $0.045 to $0.151. The premium is 11% at the low end, 6% at the top.

Runway sells Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) at 5, 7, 11 and 16 credits per image, which is $0.05, $0.07, $0.11 and $0.16. Google's own page lists a range of about $0.045 to $0.151 per image across sizes, so Runway's markup is about 11% at the cheap end ($0.05 / $0.045) and about 6% at the top ($0.16 / $0.151). On Sume the Image Router default estimate for Nano Banana 2 is $0.10.
Credit prices are from Runway and Google's range from its Gemini API pricing page (both read 2026-10-04).
| Route | Lowest tier | Highest tier | 1,000 images, lowest tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google direct | $0.045 | $0.151 | $45.00 |
| Runway credits | $0.05 (5 credits) | $0.16 (16 credits) | $50.00 |
| Sume Image Router default | $0.10 | size-dependent | $100.00 |
Reading the ratios
Runway's four credit prices are $0.05, $0.07, $0.11 and $0.16. Dividing the lowest by Google's lowest gives 0.05 / 0.045 = 1.11, and the highest by Google's highest gives 0.16 / 0.151 = 1.06. I matched the endpoints of each range because the Google page I read gives the range and not each size label, so the middle tiers are not compared one to one.
Sume bills provider list x 1.25. The router's default table has Nano Banana 2 at $0.08 per image at default quality, so $0.08 x 1.25 = $0.10. That default tier is not the cheapest size, so the Sume estimate sits above the low-end rows above and should be compared at the same output size before you buy.
Which route fits
- Pure image volume at the smallest size: Google direct, then Runway at 11% more.
- Image generation inside a larger video job: a single balance on Runway or Sume saves account juggling.
- Output size above 2K: check the top tier, where the gap between Google and Runway narrows to 6%.
Steps
- Pick the output size you really need; a 4K image at 16 credits costs more than three of the cheapest tier.
- Multiply count by the per-image price: 10,000 images at $0.05 is $500.00, at $0.045 is $450.00.
- Run ten test prompts and count retries.
A 5,000-image month
At the lowest tier, 5,000 images cost 5,000 x $0.045 = $225 on Google and 5,000 x $0.05 = $250 on Runway. At the highest tier it is $755 against $800. The Runway premium is $25 to $45 for the month, which is small enough that workflow, not price, usually decides.
Caveats
Google's cheaper Flash Lite Image variant is listed around $0.0336 for a 1K image, so a lite model is cheaper than any row in the table if its quality is enough. Prices read 2026-10-04.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Nano Banana Pro on Runway at 20 credits vs Google direct pricing
Runway sells Gemini 3 Pro Image at 20 credits ($0.20) at 1K-2K and 40 at 4K; Google lists $0.134 to $0.24. That is 1.49x at 1K-2K and 1.67x at 4K.
- OpenAI Batch has no video endpoint listed: where a video batch goes
The OpenAI Batch guide lists text, embeddings, moderation and image endpoints but no video endpoint. Here is what that leaves for a 100-video holiday job.
- OpenAI batch output order differs from input: how Sume bulk keys rows
OpenAI batch output may not follow input order, so you join on custom_id. A Sume bulk queue lists items by index in submitted order. Here is the join for each.
- OpenAI Decisions API vs Sume auto routing: different jobs
OpenAI's Decisions API (limited preview) classifies requests into answers you define. Sume's auto routing picks a media model. Why a pipeline can use both.
Written by Sume