Kling 3 Pro text-to-video is $0.14/s on fal; four Sume ids cost less
Sume lists no Kling text-to-video, only Kling 3.0 Motion Control at $0.1575. Four Sume text-to-video ids cost $0.075 to $0.125 per second against fal's $0.14.

Kling v3 Pro text-to-video is listed at $0.14 per second on fal's pricing page, so a 10-second clip costs $1.40. Sume does not list that model: its only Kling row is Kling 3.0 Motion Control at $0.1575 per output second, which transfers motion from a source video and is a different job. If you want text-to-video and the Kling price is the issue, four Sume ids cost less per second.
Four cheaper Sume rows for 10 seconds
Prices are Sume's catalog rates, which are provider list times 1.25. The last column is how much less each costs than $1.40 for 10 seconds.
| Sume id | $ per second | 10 seconds | Saving vs $1.40 |
|---|---|---|---|
| minimax-h3 at 768p | $0.075 | $0.75 | $0.65 |
| minimax-h3-max at 768p | $0.10 | $1.00 | $0.40 |
| wan-3.0 at 720p | $0.125 | $1.25 | $0.15 |
| gemini-omni-flash-1.1 at 720p | $0.125 | $1.25 | $0.15 |
What the saving does not buy
The fal page also lists Kling v2.5-turbo Pro at $0.07 per second, which is cheaper than all four Sume rows above, and its H3 Max at $0.05. So price alone does not make Sume the low-cost route; it makes four Sume ids cheaper than the newest Kling price on that page. A Kling clip and a Wan clip will not look alike, so run a test set before you swap.
Check supported limits too: minimax-h3 takes 5 to 15 seconds, wan-3.0 takes 2 to 30, and gemini-omni-flash-1.1 takes 3 to 10 seconds, with native audio always on. If you need the audio off, that last id is not a fit.
If you do need Kling
Kling 3.0 Motion Control on Sume costs $0.1575 for each output second from 1 to 30 seconds, so 10 seconds is $1.575. That is higher than fal's $1.40, but the jobs are not the same: motion control needs a driving video. For the fal snapshot in more depth see the fal pricing snapshot.
Running the swap test
Take five prompts you already run on Kling and render each at 10 seconds on minimax-h3 at 768p. The cost is 5 x $0.75 = $3.75, against 5 x $1.40 = $7.00 on fal's Kling v3 Pro. Compare motion, faces and text legibility. If minimax-h3 fails on your hardest prompts, step up to minimax-h3-max at $1.00 per 10 seconds and repeat.
If neither works, the price table is irrelevant and Kling is the right choice.
What I could not confirm
fal's page lists both Kling v3 and v2.5-turbo under a Pro label. It does not state audio, resolution or duration limits on the rows read, so the cost comparison is per second only. All vendor figures were read on 2026-10-09 and are listed in the sources; Sume figures come from its public catalog and docs the same day.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- LTX-2.5 vs MiniMax H3: license lines and run requirements
LTX-2.5 vs MiniMax H3 from vendor pages: 10M vs 20M USD revenue lines, excluded territories, Python and CUDA needs, frame rules, audio, and what Sume lists.
- Luma Ray 3.2 alternative: one /v1/generations route vs Sume's two
Luma's API sends images and video through POST /v1/generations. Sume splits them into /v1/videos and /v1/images and does not list ray-3.2 in its docs.
- Luma Ray3.2 allows 16 keyframes; Sume offers first and last frame
Luma lists up to 16 keyframes per clip on its Ray3.2 API. Sume does not list Luma; its video models take a first and a last frame through frame_images.
- Luma Ray 3.2 reframe vs LTX reframe: 60-second 1080p, $21.60 vs $12.00
Reframing a 60-second clip to 1080p costs $21.60 on Luma's page (36 cents a second) and $12.00 on LTX's (20 cents). Lower tiers and Sume's $0.02 crop too.
Written by Sume