Kling 4.0 vs Kling 3.0: the spec differences in one dated table

Length, resolution, HDR, references, keyframes, audio and prompt size, Kling 4.0 against 3.0 as stated on Kling's pages, plus how each maps to a Sume request.

4 min readSume
All posts

Kling 4.0 changes six things you plan around: clip length (3 to 30 seconds), resolution and HDR, reference inputs, keyframes, audio, and prompt size. The table below sets Kling's own statements side by side, as read on 2026-10-03. Where a page did not state the Kling 3.0 value, the cell says so.

The table

Sources are the Kling 4.0 vs 3.0 page, the Kling 4.0 guide, and the multiple keyframes guide.

Kling 4.0 against 3.0 as stated by Kling (read 2026-10-03)
SpecKling 3.0Kling 4.0
Native length3 to 15 s3 to 30 s
ResolutionNot restated on the page720p, 1080p, 4K, plus 21:9 ultrawide
Color8-bit SDR10-bit HDR at 1080p and 4K (the guide says HDR is coming soon)
Reference assets7 images, or 1 video plus 4 imagesUp to 15 combined: 10 images, 5 videos (30 s combined), 7 subjects (3 video-based)
KeyframesStart and end frames onlyUp to 10 keyframe images
AudioNot restated on the pageTwo-channel stereo, improved lip-sync
Lip-sync languagesNot restated on the pageAdds Portuguese, German, French, Hindi to Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean, Spanish
Prompt sizeNot restated on the pageUp to 8,000 tokens

The HDR contradiction

One row needs care. The 4.0 guide says HDR is coming soon, while the comparison page lists 10-bit HDR. Treat HDR as unconfirmed until a delivered file shows it, and check the bit depth of a real output before you promise HDR to a client.

Mapping to a Sume request

The Sume video docs describe a different spread of limits. Most catalog models top out at 15 seconds, seedance-2.5 and wan-3.0 reach 30 seconds, and first and last frames go in frame_images while style or content references go in input_references. Those are the two fields a Kling 4.0 keyframe or Omni Reference plan would have to be translated into.

Which rows change a budget

Not every row in the table affects cost. Length does: a 30 second single shot replaces what used to be two clips and a join. Reference capacity does too: ten images and five videos in one request can replace several separate generations used to establish a character or a product.

Other rows affect risk more than cost. Keyframes reduce the number of times a story has to be stitched. HDR affects delivery, since a 10-bit file needs a pipeline that keeps 10 bits. Audio and languages affect whether you need a separate voice track. Rank the rows by what your project actually uses before you decide whether 4.0 is worth the switch.

  • Length: fewer stitches, fewer visible joins.
  • References: fewer setup generations for consistent characters.
  • Keyframes: more control over a long shot.
  • HDR: only matters if your delivery path preserves it.
  • Audio and languages: may remove a separate voice step.

Check the catalog, not the announcement

The docs name no Kling 4.0 id on the pages read here. List the live catalog before writing code against it, since new ids appear in GET /v1/videos/models rather than in a blog post. The video generation docs describe the response fields to compare against this table.

  • Compare supported_durations with the 3 to 30 second claim.
  • Compare supported_resolutions and supported_aspect_ratios with the table.
  • Read supported_input_references to see which reference types are accepted.
  • Read generate_audio before assuming sound is on.

Sources

Related posts

More in Comparisons

All Comparisons posts

Written by Sume