H3 on vLLM-Omni: 87 s on 4 B300 for one clip, and the cost
MiniMax says an 8.7 s H3 clip takes about 87 s on 4 B300 GPUs. Turn that into GPU-seconds, a break-even rate, and compare with a 9 s Sume job.

MiniMax's H3 page gives one concrete serving figure: on the official vLLM-Omni recipe, an 8.7 second clip end to end in about 87 seconds on 4 B300 GPUs. That is 348 GPU-seconds for one clip. A nine-second hosted job on Sume at 768p costs $0.675, so self-hosting wins on raw GPU rent only if you pay less than about $6.98 per GPU-hour and keep the rig busy. All inputs below are stated, and the GPU rates are assumptions, not vendor prices.
The arithmetic
GPU-seconds per clip = 87 seconds x 4 GPUs = 348. Cost per clip = 348 / 3,600 x the hourly rate of one GPU. The table uses four hourly rates you can replace with your own quote.
| Assumed rate per GPU-hour | Rental cost for 348 GPU-seconds | Against Sume 9 s at 768p |
|---|---|---|
| $2.00 | $0.1933 | Cheaper |
| $4.00 | $0.3867 | Cheaper |
| $6.00 | $0.58 | Cheaper |
| $8.00 | $0.7733 | More expensive |
What the table leaves out
The figure is a single clip on a warm server. It does not include model load time, idle GPUs between requests, the cost of the 4-GPU node being rented in whole units, storage for the checkpoint, or the engineer who runs the stack. If the node sits idle half the time, double the cost column.
The vendor figure is also for open weights, which generate natively at 768p short side according to the same page. The 2K output is described as API only, so a 2K comparison cannot be made from local weights.
Where a hosted job is simpler
Sume's minimax-h3 accepts 5 to 15 seconds at native 480p or 768p, and its video docs describe the flow: submit to /v1/videos, get a job id and a polling URL, then download when the status is completed. There is no cluster to size. Sume reserves its price at submit, so the cost is known before the work starts.
Sume does not publish a latency promise in the pages cited here; its best-practices note says video generation usually takes from 30 seconds to several minutes depending on model and parameters. Compare that to your own measured number, not to a vendor demo.
Decision rule
Use the break-even rate as a screen, then add your idle factor.
- If your quote is above $6.98 per GPU-hour, hosted is cheaper before idle time and labor.
- If you pay far less than that and generate clips all day, the rig can win, but only inside the license limits: the weights exclude the US, EU, UK and South Korea.
- If clip volume is bursty, hosted jobs cost nothing while idle.
Reading the vendor figure carefully
The figure is MiniMax's own example on its H3 deployment page, given as 'e.g.' for the official vLLM-Omni recipe, which serves an OpenAI-compatible video endpoint. SGLang Diffusion is the second serving stack the page names. The page does not say what resolution or settings produced 87 seconds, so treat 348 GPU-seconds as an order of magnitude for planning, then measure your own prompt, length and resolution before you commit to a rig.
If your clips are longer than 8.7 seconds, do not scale the number linearly without testing. Cost per output second is the figure to track: 348 GPU-seconds over 8.7 seconds is 40 GPU-seconds per output second, by division.
Sources
Related posts
More in Models
- Higgsfield Soul on Sume: half a cent per image, batches of 1 or 4
higgsfield-soul costs $0.005 at 720p and $0.0075 at 1080p on Sume. It takes batch sizes 1 or 4, no references. Price table and a four-image call.
- Higgsfield Soul on Sume: 1 cent an image, n of 1 or 4, $100 per 10,000
Higgsfield Soul is the cheapest Sume image model at 1 cent. It is text-only, takes n of 1 or 4 and 720p or 1080p, so 10,000 images is 2,500 calls and $100.
- High to max on 100 hero images: GPT Image 2.5 adds $20, xhigh adds $5
Upgrade 100 GPT Image 2.5 hero images from high to xhigh or max: the extra cost on Sume is $5 or $20 at 1024-class size. The arithmetic is shown.
- How many aspect ratios does each Sume image model list? Oct 2026
Nano Banana 2.1 lists 15 aspect ratio values, Imagen 5. A count for every Sume image row, and why the number decides banners, stories and 4:5 posts.
Written by Sume