GPT Image 2.5 portrait 1024x1536 costs less than square

On fal, GPT Image 2.5 high is $0.04116 at 1024x1536 and $0.05268 at 1024x1024, though portrait has more pixels. Sume at x 1.25: about $0.051 vs $0.066.

4 min readSume
All posts

A 1024x1536 portrait image costs less than a 1024x1024 square on GPT Image 2.5, even though it has 50 percent more pixels. fal lists high quality at $0.04116 for 1024x1536 and $0.05268 for 1024x1024. Sume's x 1.25 makes that about $0.051 against $0.066 before input tokens. The cheapest listed size is 1024x768 at $0.03612.

The ladder at high quality

The output-token count in OpenAI's size and quality calculator is not proportional to pixel count: GPT Image 2.5 rounds the image to a grid of patches, and the grid for the long edge is shared across the ratio. The result is that near-square images cost the most per pixel. fal's page lists the prices below, and Sume's rate card reproduces them from the same formula.

GPT Image 2.5, high quality, output only (before input tokens); fal list and Sume at x 1.25 (read 2026-10-03)
SizePixelsfal listSume output only
1024x768786,432$0.03612$0.04515
1920x10802,073,600$0.03960$0.04950
1024x15361,572,864$0.04116$0.05145
1024x10241,048,576$0.05268$0.06585
2560x14403,686,400$0.05529$0.06911
3840x21608,294,400$0.10008$0.12510

Practical use

If the destination is a vertical or 16:9 placement, generate at that size instead of square and cropping: it is both the right shape and cheaper. Sume's image docs set the legal range: both edges multiples of 16, maximum edge 3840, aspect ratio at most 3:1 and between 655,360 and 8,294,400 pixels. Quality-by-size figures are in the full price table.

Sources

Related posts

More in Pricing

All Pricing posts

Written by Sume