Gemini Omni Flash $17.50 per million tokens vs Sume per-second price
Google lists Gemini Omni Flash video at $17.50 per million tokens, about $0.10 a second at 720p. Thirty 8-second clips: $24.00 at that rate, $30.00 on Sume.
Thirty 8-second clips at 720p cost about $24.00 at Google's listed rate for Gemini Omni Flash and $30.00 on Sume. Google's Gemini Developer API pricing page (read 2026-10-08) prices Omni Flash video output at $17.50 per million tokens and describes that as approximately $0.10 per second for 720p. Sume lists Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 per second at $0.125 at 720p, which is Google's rate times 1.25, rounded up to the cent per job.
What Google lists
The page bills Omni Flash by tokens, not seconds, and gives the per-second figure as an approximation for 720p. Dividing $0.10 by $17.50 per million gives roughly 5,700 tokens per second, which is arithmetic on Google's two numbers, not a figure Google states.
The page names Gemini Omni Flash. Sume's catalog row is Gemini Omni Flash 1.1, and the page does not say which version its price covers, so the comparison is indicative.
What Sume lists
Sume's video-router catalog lists Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 at 360p, 720p, 1080p and 4K, from 3 to 10 seconds, in 16:9 or 9:16, with native synced audio always on. List per second is $0.03, $0.10, $0.15 and $0.30, and Sume sells at list times 1.25. Each job is rounded up to the cent, so an 8-second clip at 720p is exactly $1.00 and a 5-second clip is $0.63.
| Clip | Google, $0.10 per s | Sume, 720p | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 s | $0.30 | $0.38 | $0.08 |
| 5 s | $0.50 | $0.63 | $0.13 |
| 8 s (default) | $0.80 | $1.00 | $0.20 |
| 10 s | $1.00 | $1.25 | $0.25 |
| 30 clips of 8 s | $24.00 | $30.00 | $6.00 |
What the difference buys
Google's page is a developer-API price. A Sume call needs no Google account or Gemini API setup, goes through the same API key and job model as the other video rows, and appears on one usage ledger. That convenience is what the 25 percent covers; it is a choice, not a free upgrade.
If you already hold a Gemini API account and only use Omni Flash, calling Google directly is cheaper at this resolution. If you mix models in one batch, the single ledger and the shared job polling are the reason to use Sume.
The comparison is for the 720p tier only. At 1080p Sume lists Omni Flash at $0.1875 a second and at 4K at $0.375, and Google's page does not give a per-second figure at those resolutions that this post relies on, so no Google column is shown for them.
Whatever the route, budget with the rounded-up job price, not the per-second rate times seconds. A 3-second clip is $0.38, not $0.375, and over 100 short clips that rounding adds up to about $0.50.
- Sume's 8-second default matches the example length in the table.
- Google's page gives the 720p figure only as approximately $0.10, so do not budget to the cent from it.
- Sume's 1080p and 4K rows are priced separately; see the Shopify post on what 4K costs.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- GLM-5.3 off-peak 50% points vs a Sume dollar spend cap
Z.ai meters GLM-5.3 in points with a 50% off-peak rate. Why a Sume dollar cap is a different meter, and how to schedule agent work.
- GPT Image 2.5 on fal runs $0.00402 to $0.40026 per image: on Sume
fal's ChatGPT Image 2.5 Flare page lists $0.00402 for 1024x768 low and $0.40026 for 3840x2160 max. At Sume's 1.25 multiplier that is about $0.005 to $0.50.
- Does gpt-image-2.5 cost more at 4K? Prices from 1024 to 3840x2160
gpt-image-2.5 price by pixel size on Sume: 1024x1024, 1536x1024, 2048x2048 and 3840x2160 at medium and high, plus the custom-size rules from the docs.
- gpt-image-2.5 xhigh and max at 2048 and 4K: up to $0.54 an image
gpt-image-2.5 max costs $0.5353 at 2048x2048 and $0.5004 at 3840x2160 on Sume; xhigh is $0.2379 and $0.2224. Size-by-tier table and a spend guard in Python.
Written by Sume