Diwali greeting set on Ideogram 4.5: 12 designs, 3 ratios, $2.70
Twelve Diwali greetings in 1:1, 4:5 and 9:16 on Ideogram 4.5 at medium quality bill about $2.70 on Sume. Drafts at low quality cost $1.35.

Twelve Diwali greeting designs, each in 1:1, 4:5 and 9:16, make 36 images, and on ideogram/ideogram-v4.5 at medium quality that is about $2.70 on Sume: 36 times $0.075. Low-quality drafts of the same set cost $1.35, and a high-quality final pass on your three best designs in all three ratios adds about $2.48.
Greeting art is text-heavy, so a model that draws lettering well is the usual pick. Sume's row lists 15 aspect ratios, including all three used here.
Cost by quality
Ideogram 4.5 prices by quality, not by size. Fal's list is $0.03, $0.06 and $0.22 per image, and Sume bills list times 1.25.
| Quality | Billed per image | 36 images |
|---|---|---|
| low | $0.0375 | $1.35 |
| medium (default) | $0.075 | $2.70 |
| high | $0.275 | $9.90 |
A two-pass plan
- Pass 1: generate all 12 designs at
1:1andquality: "low": 12 images, $0.45. - Pick the best 4 and rerun each at medium in all three ratios: 12 images, $0.90.
- Spend
highonly on the single design you will print or pay to promote: 3 ratios, $0.825. - Total for the plan: about $2.18, below the all-medium $2.70.
Prompt notes
Put the greeting words in quotes and keep them short. Name the script and size ('large centered text'), the palette (marigold, deep teal, gold) and any symbol ('a lit diya'). Check spelling on every image by eye, as text rendering is good, not perfect. Avoid printing a date unless you have confirmed it.
For 9:16 and 4:5, restate where the text goes, because the layout changes with the ratio.
Request
One call per design and ratio:
{
"model": "ideogram/ideogram-v4.5",
"prompt": "Diwali greeting card, a lit diya, marigold petals, text 'Happy Diwali' in gold lettering",
"aspect_ratio": "4:5",
"resolution": "1K",
"quality": "medium"
}Sending the set to the client
Name files by design and ratio, for example 'diya-4x5-medium', and keep the low-quality drafts in a separate folder so approvals never mix them up. Share the 1:1 versions first; they are quick to judge and cheap to redo. Once a design is approved, run the other two ratios, so you never pay for ratios of a rejected design.
Record the usage.cost of each call. At the end, the sum should match the table above, and any difference points to a retry you can explain.
Checklist for festival art
Check that every symbol suits the occasion and the audience, and have a native reader proof the lettering. If the card will run as an ad, check the platform's text rules for the placement. These steps cost no credits, and a typo caught here saves a re-render at medium or high quality.
Keep one master prompt and change only the greeting line and the ratio instructions. A set that shares a prompt tends to share a look.
What Sume does not do
Sume does not accept output_format on this row; the provider selects it. Sume also does not choose the quality for you: if you omit quality, the request runs at medium, so a draft run needs low set explicitly.
Sources
Related posts
More in Use cases
- The docs' 3+4+5 second UGC avatar ad: $2.94 at Plus, $6.60 at Max
The multi-scene example in Sume's docs plans a 3 s hook, 4 s silence beat and 5 s call to action: 12 seconds, $2.94 at Plus and $6.60 at Max.
- Does a Music 1.0 bed avoid Content ID on a Short? What is promised
YouTube says Audio Library songs get no Content ID claim; a Short over a minute with a claim is blocked. Sume's Music 1.0 is $0.125 and makes no such promise.
- Draft at 480p, finish at 1080p: three drafts and a final for $22.29
Three 10 s Seedance 2.5 drafts at 480p plus one 1080p final cost $22.29 on Sume, against $42.66 for three 1080p tries. The arithmetic.
- Dubbing a 3-minute video on Sume: 46 cents before captions
Sume's docs list no dubbing endpoint. You assemble one: STT 3 cents, your translation, TTS 13 cents and a 30-cent render come to 46 cents before captions.
Written by Sume