45 listings, 3 takes each: 135 images at 1K on three models

135 images (45 listings x n=3) cost $13.50 on Nano Banana 2.1 1K, $25.31 on Pro 1K and $3.34 on GPT Image 2.5 low.

4 min readSume
All posts

The short answer

Forty-five listing photos with three takes each is 135 images. At 1K on Sume that is $13.50 on Nano Banana 2.1, $25.31 on Nano Banana Pro and $3.34 on GPT Image 2.5 low. Sume bills cost_usd x n, so asking for n=3 in one call costs the same as three calls.

The gap between the cheapest and the dearest row is large enough that a pick-the-best step should be priced before the model is chosen.

What n does

n repeats the same prompt and inputs and returns several images in one response. The Image API docs say most models take n from 1 to 4 and that the docs' general ceiling is 10, with per-model ceilings lower, so read the n descriptor in the catalog before relying on a number above 4. n=3 is inside every model's range in this post.

Use separate calls when each take needs a different instruction. Use n=3 when you just want variety from one prompt. Either way the bill is the same.

The totals

Each call is 3 x the row; 45 calls make the run. The table shows the arithmetic with the catalog default-options rows as of 2026-10-08.

45 listings x n=3 at 1K, as of 2026-10-08
ModelPer call (n=3)45 callsPer listing
Nano Banana 2.1 1K3 x $0.10 = $0.30$13.50$0.30
Nano Banana Pro 1K3 x $0.1875 = $0.5625$25.31$0.5625
GPT Image 2.5 low 1K3 x $0.02475 = $0.07425$3.34$0.07425

Budgeting a pick step

If you keep one of three takes and run the keeper through a second pass, say Pro at 2K ($0.1875), add 45 x $0.1875 = $8.44. A GPT low draft set plus a Pro 2K polish totals $11.78; three Pro 1K takes with no polish total $25.31.

A failed generation is not billed, so a retry only costs when the retried call completes. Hold a small reserve for slow calls that return a 202 job and finish later; they bill on completion, the same as sync calls.

Reading the totals

Pro at 1K costs 1.8750 times the 2.1 row at the same tier, and 2.1 costs 4.04 times the GPT low row. Those multipliers carry straight through to the 135-image run, so the question is whether the better model needs fewer takes. If Pro gets a usable image in 2 takes where 2.1 needs 3, the Pro run is 45 x 2 x $0.1875 = $16.88 against $13.50, and 2.1 still wins on price.

The tier you pick also matters. The 2.1 row falls to $0.075 at 0.5K, which would put the same 135 images at $10.12. That is fine for thumbnails and contact sheets. It is not the size to hand to a marketplace that wants a large main photo.

Whatever you choose, test with one listing before you submit the other 44, and compare usage.cost with the row.

Sources

Related posts

More in Pricing

All Pricing posts

Written by Sume