16-megapixel image: Sume upscale $0.20 vs FLUX.3 4k generation $0.607
Sume bills image upscale at $0.20 per image (about 16 MP reserved). BFL lists a FLUX.3 4k image, about 16 megapixels, at $0.607. 100 images: $20 vs $60.70.
If you need a roughly 16-megapixel image, Sume's image upscale costs $0.20 per image, while generating a FLUX.3 4k image at Black Forest Labs costs $0.607. For 100 images that is $20.00 against $60.70. The two are not the same job: upscaling starts from an image you already have, and generation starts from a prompt. When you already hold a good 1K image, the upscale is the cheaper way to reach a large file.
Sume's catalog describes the upscale price as $0.20 per image after Sume margin, with about 16 megapixels of generative output reserved. BFL's page calls its 4k step about 16 megapixels. Those two figures line up, which is why this comparison is worth making.
The numbers side by side
Read the Sume figure as a flat per-image price. The catalog states it as $0.20 per image, with a minimum and a maximum that are both 20 cents.
| Option | Starts from | Price per image | 100 images |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sume image upscale | an existing image | $0.20 | $20.00 |
| Sume Nano Banana 2.1 at 4K | a prompt | $0.20 | $20.00 |
| Sume GPT Image 2.5 high at 4K | a prompt | $0.2225 | $22.25 |
| Sume Nano Banana Pro at 4K | a prompt | $0.375 | $37.50 |
| BFL FLUX.3 Image 4k | a prompt | $0.607 | $60.70 |
Upscale or regenerate
Nano Banana 2.1 at 4K and image upscale both cost $0.20, so the decision is not about price. Regeneration changes the picture, because the model draws a new image from your prompt. Upscale keeps the composition you approved and adds pixels. If the client already signed off on a 1K draft, upscale it. If you are still exploring, generate small first and upscale only the winners.
A simple budget: 100 drafts at Seedream 5 Lite ($4.375) plus 10 upscaled winners ($2.00) comes to $6.375, which is far under the $60.70 you would pay to generate the same ten pieces at FLUX.3 4k with no drafts. That arithmetic ignores the quality of either path, so run a trial.
A 100-image example
Take 100 product photos that already exist at 1K. Upscaling all of them on Sume costs $20.00 (100 times $0.20). Regenerating them at FLUX.3 4k would cost $60.70, and it would not preserve the photos at all. Add background removal first at $0.0225 per image and the Sume path is $22.25 for 100 cutouts at large size. Nothing in that chain depends on image size, since the catalog lists both fixed prices per image.
Calling the upscale
Sume exposes image upscale at POST /v1/image-upscale-1.0/upscale, and the job result comes from the standard job endpoints. In MCP the tool is image_upscale_create, which is a paid tool that needs an idempotency_key. See MCP tools and gates for the full list, and the jobs and results guide for polling.
BFL's credit price can change, so confirm it on the BFL pricing page before you plan a large run. Sume does not list FLUX.3, so the comparison is a price check only.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- 22-second Wan 3.0 clip: 720p plus video upscale or 1080p?
On Sume a 22-second Wan 3.0 clip costs $2.75 at 720p, $5.50 at 1080p. Video Upscale adds $0.009 a second, so 720p becomes $2.95. A price check only.
- 2,500 Nano Banana 2.1 images at 1K: Google Batch $42 vs Sume $250
Google lists Nano Banana 2.1 at $0.0168 per 1K image on Batch and $0.0336 Standard. Sume's row is $0.10. Here is the 2,500-image bill and when each makes sense.
- 250,000 characters: ElevenLabs v4 Turbo before/after Oct 12 vs Sume
250,000 characters on ElevenLabs v4 Turbo cost $2.75 until Oct 12 and $10.00 after. Sume TTS is $11.88 for the same text. The break-even is the date.
- 2K image price check: FLUX.3 $0.100, GPT 2.5 $0.0556, Banana $0.15
A 2K image costs $0.100 on BFL's FLUX.3, $0.055625 on Sume's GPT Image 2.5 medium, and $0.15 on Sume's Nano Banana 2.1. 100 images: $10.00, $5.56, $15.00.
Written by Sume