Help center video library: 100 articles as 20-second avatar clips
Price a help center video for every article with one Sume avatar: 100 clips at 20 seconds on standard, plus and max, and a staged review before full spend.
One hundred 20-second help center clips cost $368.00 on Sume standard, $490.00 on plus and $1100.00 on max, with no product image, from the per-second rate card of 0.184, 0.245 and 0.55 dollars. Adding a product image raises the rate to 0.194, 0.258 and 0.58 per second. Sume bills by estimated duration of the script, so the first thing to control is word count.
Cost with and without a product image
Twenty seconds each across 100 articles.
| Quality | No product image | With product image |
|---|---|---|
| standard | $368.00 | $388.00 |
| plus | $490.00 | $516.00 |
| max | $1100.00 | $1160.00 |
Spend in stages
Render five clips on standard first and have a support lead review them. Move to plus or max only for the articles that get the most views. Retry-safe submits use one idempotency key per article id and version.
What the price does not include
Hosting, captions as a separate job, and any timeline join are separate. Inline captions on the avatar clip do not create a separate caption bill. See the avatar video docs.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- How much is a 90-second AI voiceover: MAI-Voice-2.1 vs Sume TTS
A 90-second read is about 1,350 characters: $0.0203 on MAI-Voice-2.1-Flash, $0.0297 on Standard, and 7 cents billed on Sume TTS.
- Ideogram 4.5 edits per month: what 50, 200 and 1,000 a day cost
Monthly Ideogram 4.5 edit bills on Sume at 50, 200 and 1,000 edits a day: $56.25 to $1,125 at low, $112.50 to $2,250 at medium, with a mixed-quality plan.
- A misspelled Ideogram 4.5 edit still bills: budget for retries
On Sume a completed image edit is billed in full even if the text came back wrong. Only failed or cancelled jobs are free. How to budget retries.
- Is Sume really fal list x 1.25? Four fal pages checked
Wan 3.0, Kling v3 Pro, MiniMax H3 Max and Ideogram 4.5 on fal, read 2026-10-05, set against Sume's per-second and per-image rates. The ratio is 1.25.
Written by Sume