GPT Image 2.5 quality auto holds the max price: a 12-image batch
Quality auto on gpt-image-2.5 (Flare, Sunburst) reserves max: $0.21072 of output at 1024x1024 before Sume pricing, so twelve images hold $3.16 or more.

If you leave GPT Image 2.5 on quality: auto, Sume reserves the price of max quality. The image docs give the 1024 x 1024 output cost for max as $0.21072 before input tokens and Sume pricing, which is $0.2634 after the 1.25 factor, so twelve images hold at least 12 x $0.2634 = $3.1608. The same twelve at a fixed low quality at 1K are 12 x $0.02475 = $0.297 on the Sume list.
A hold is not a charge. A completed job captures the actual cost, and the hold in excess is released, so auto is a balance issue before it is a billing issue. A small wallet that could afford twelve low-quality images can still fail a twelve-image auto batch with a 402.
What the docs say
Flare and Sunburst use fal token rates of $30 per million output image tokens, $8 per million input image tokens and $5 per million input text tokens. Output estimates follow OpenAI's size and quality calculator. auto quality reserves max, and auto size, and named presets without a verified pixel mapping, reserve the upper bound of output tokens. Input token counts are estimates, and fal rounds the total up to $0.0001.
| Quality | Output cost before Sume pricing | Sume output price | 12 images |
|---|---|---|---|
| xhigh | $0.09366 | $0.11707 | $1.4049 |
| max (what auto reserves) | $0.21072 | $0.26340 | $3.1608 |
Pin the quality
The cheap fix is to send an explicit quality. Sume lists low, medium, high, xhigh and max; if you omit quality entirely the default is high, so auto is something you have to choose. Sume's list prices by tier at default size are $0.02475 (low, 1K), $0.055625 (medium, 2K) and $0.2225 (high, 4K), and the tier and size together set the figure.
For a catalog of twelve product shots at medium and 2K, the list price is 12 x $0.055625 = $0.6675, about a fifth of the auto hold.
When auto is the right choice
auto is for prompts where you cannot say in advance how much detail the image needs and are willing to pay for the ceiling. If the balance is large and the images are few, the hold is not a problem. In a batch, the hold multiplies by the number of accepted jobs, so check the product against the balance and the plan's accepted job capacity before you submit.
Reading the hold on the ledger
After you submit, the usage ledger shows a reserved row at the estimated amount. When the job completes, the captured row is the actual cost and the unused part of the hold is released. Compare the two on the first image of a batch: if the captured amount is far below the reserved one, pin a lower quality for the rest and recover headroom. The numbers in this post cover output tokens at one size only; input tokens for references and prompts are extra, and fal rounds the total up to $0.0001.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- How many 480p drafts cost one 1080p render? Wan 3.0 and Seedance 2.5
A 9-second Wan 3.0 clip is 4 drafts to 1 final at 1080p; Seedance 2.5 is 5.29 drafts per 1080p. The break-even table, priced from Sume rates.
- Ideogram 4.5 price by quality: fal list vs Sume, per 1,000 images
Ideogram 4.5 is $0.03, $0.06 or $0.22 per image on fal by quality, size-independent. Sume bills list x 1.25: $0.0375, $0.075, $0.275. Per-1,000 table.
- Is 1080p worth 2.5x? Seedance 2.5 12-second clip by resolution
A 12-second Seedance 2.5 clip costs $3.22 at 480p, $6.93 at 720p and $17.06 at 1080p on Sume. 1080p is 2.46x the 720p price and 5.29x 480p.
- Is Nano Banana 2.1 free in the Gemini API? The price table says no
Google's pricing page shows no free-tier price for Nano Banana 2.1 image output: only paid rates, $0.0336 per 1K image. Sume bills per image from a wallet.
Written by Sume