Which image model for thumbnails? Six Sume picks from 3 to 10 cents
Six Sume image models that list 16:9 and 4:5 for thumbnails and covers, from Qwen Image at 3 cents to Nano Banana 2.1 at 10, with the cost of 12 options.
For thumbnails on Sume, start with six models that list 16:9, 9:16 and 4:5: Qwen Image (3 cents), Flux 2 Pro (4), Seedream 5.0 Lite (5), GPT Image 2.5 at high (7), Ideogram 4.5 at medium (8) and Nano Banana 2.1 (10). A set of 12 options per video costs from $0.36 to $1.20. Sume does not publish a quality ranking, so test two or three on your own style.
Cost of a 12-option set
Sume bills the catalog list price multiplied by 1.25 and rounded up to the next cent. Twelve options is three calls with n set to 4.
| Model | Billed per image | 12 options | 100 videos x 12 options | Takes references |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen Image | 3 cents | $0.36 | $36 | yes |
| Flux 2 Pro | 4 cents | $0.48 | $48 | yes |
| Seedream 5.0 Lite | 5 cents | $0.60 | $60 | yes |
| ChatGPT Image 2.5 | 7 cents | $0.84 | $84 | yes |
| Ideogram 4.5 | 8 cents | $0.96 | $96 | yes |
| Nano Banana 2.1 | 10 cents | $1.20 | $120 | yes |
Pick by the job
Thumbnails with a face from your own photo need references, so choose from the edit-capable rows. GPT Image 2.5 takes up to 16 references, and Ideogram 4.5 takes 5 total. For lettering you will be changing often, the Ideogram 4.5 docs say an edit without aspect_ratio keeps the shape of the source image, so a headline revision does not change the frame.
For pure volume tests, draft at Qwen Image or Flux 2 Pro, pick the composition, then re-render the winner at higher cost. The ratio is set per request, so 16:9 for the video and 4:5 or 9:16 for a social cutdown are one parameter apart.
- Cheapest 16:9: Qwen Image at 3 cents.
- Most references: GPT Image 2.5 at 16.
- Most ratios for odd placements: Ideogram 4.5 lists 15, including 16:10 and 3:1.
Check before you publish
Look at the result at about 168x94 pixels, the size of a small suggested-video tile. Text that survives there will survive anywhere. Rejected ratios return 400, so read supported_parameters first.
A thumbnail workflow
Generate 4 options per call at n=4 with a 16:9 ratio. Choose the best, then re-run it as an edit with your face photo or brand art as a reference to fix identity. Keep headline text short, since a thumbnail is read at a small size, and add exact wording after generation if a misspelled word would be costly. Budget the whole loop: three n=4 calls on Seedream 5.0 Lite cost 12 x 5 = 60 cents, and one polish edit at 7 cents on GPT Image 2.5 brings the video to 67 cents.
Sources
Related posts
More in Models
- Which Sume image model after this week's launches: lookup by need
A lookup table: text drafts, photo edits, label text, 4K, 12+ references. Maps Nano Banana 2.1, Imagen 4, GPT Image 2.5 and Hy Image to what Sume lists.
- Which Sume image model for what job: one price table, Oct 2026
Pick a Sume image model by job: thumbnails, product shots, text in images, edits and cheap drafts. One table with ids and billed cents, as of 2026-10-08.
- Which video model for a 12 s 9:16 clip with end frame and sound?
Seedance 2.5, Wan 3.0, Kling 3 and MiniMax H3 all take a 12-second 9:16 clip with an end frame on Sume. Prices run from $0.90 to $6.94; here is the pick.
- Which Sume video models stop at 15 seconds and which reach 30?
Seedance 2.5, Wan 3.0, Genjutsu and H3 Max Recast go past 15 seconds on Sume; MiniMax H3 stops at 15 and Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 at 10. The full limit table.
Written by Sume